Vol.
VI.
St. James, Beaver Island, Lake Michigan, April 3, 1856.
No. 4.
THE SPAULDING STORY.
1. Among the works published against the Priesthood of Joseph Smith,
and his associates, and their successors, and the authority of the Book
of Mormon as one of the Sacred Records, the leading work, from which
all others are more or less derived, is E. D. Howe's "History of
Mormonism." This work first appeared in 1834, under the title of "Mormonism Unveiled."
2. Of this book thirty-seven pages are made up of the certificates and
affidavits of nearly one hundred persons, to prove that Joseph and his
associates were vagrants, money-diggers, and superstitious, ignorant
and vicious persons, and that they got up the Book of Mormon as a
speculation.
3. First, among these is an affidavit of Peter Ingersoll, dated
Palmyra, Wayne County, N. Y., Dec. 3d, 1833, certified by Thomas P.
Baldwin, Judge of Wayne County Court, to have been sworn before him,
"according to law," the 9th day of Dec., 1833. A few pages subsequent,
are the certificates of six witnesses that Ingersoll is worthy of
credit; a rather suspicious circumstance, considering that his veracity
had not been questioned.
4. This same Peter Ingersoll is now a resident of Lapeer County,
Michigan, and solemnly denies that he ever signed or made oath to the
affidavit, or any other affidavit on the subject. As Thomas P. Baldwin
certifies that Ingersoll did make oath to the statement, according to
law, whereas, in fact, the law did not authorize him to administer any
such oath, or any extrajudicial oath whatever, his certificate is, to
say the least, not to be received against Ingersoll's solemn statement
that he never swore to the affidavit. The certificate is certainly
false in one point; for as there is no law for administering such an
oath, it could not have been done according to law.
5. But as the name of Ingersoll is certainly forged, that of Judge
Baldwin probably is. The title of his office is erroneously written to
his signature, a mistake he would not be likely to make himself, though
E. D. Howe, of Painesville, Ohio, might; not being acquainted with New
York jurisprudence. In 1833 there was not in the State of New York such
an office as Judge of the County Court. Circuit Courts, Oyer and
Terminer, Common Pleas and General Sessions were held for every county,
but there was no "County Court." Every official act requiring the
signature of a Judge, was signed by him as Judge of some one of these
particular Courts; not as Judge of some imaginary Court, having no
existence.
6. Upon an examination of all these certificates, it will be perceived
that not one of them is authenticated in legal form; some are not
signed at all; they are often contradictory one to another, and much of
them is on hearsay. Not one is certified under the seal of any Court.
When it is considered that religious animosities are the bitterest of
all human hatred, and that these were got up on the ground where Joseph
commenced his ministry, among those most bitterly opposed to him, if
the certificates were really genuine, the wonder would not be that
though a righteous man so much was said against him, but so little.
7. Bunyan, Luther, Calvin, Knox, Wesley, Whitfield, if so judged, on
the exclusive testimony of their enemies, would come off worse, and
Jesus and his Apostles far worse. But at this time, while most of the
witnesses, whose testimony is recorded against him, are yet living,
scattered through half the States, and able to answer for themselves,
the Saints Know and Continually assert that most of these certificates
are forgeries, never sworn, signed or seen by those whose names are
signed to them; and they perpetually challenge the world to the
investigation, assured that the cause which must be supported by
forgery is rotten.
8. No one need start up in surprise and say, men would not dare publish
forged certificates and affidavits. It is not a crime, by the law of
any State in the Union. The affidavits, being extrajudicial, and of no
legal force, the laws will not take cognizance of the forgery, if they
are forged, nor of the perjury, if they are false. But E. D. Howe, the
author of the book, is an Ohio lawyer, and in getting up the book
attempted to give these evidences a legal form, and he has made such
certificates over the names of Justices and a Judge, as those officers
would not use in the State of New York, unless ignorant of their own
official designations.
9. Moreover, though the object of these certificates is to impeach the
credibility of the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, and the character
of the Prophet himself, they are anything but unanimous, and prove
little against them but being superstitious. On this the accusers have
no advantage of the accused; for Stafford, one of the witnesses,
certifies that he furnished them a sheep to sacrifice to an evil spirit
to appease his wrath, so that he would not spirit away hidden treasures
they were digging for, and was to have a share of the enchanted
treasures when found.
10. Not one word of this mass of testimony is worthy one moment credit,
both because it is unquestionably forged, because, if genuine, it is
too ignorant to be worthy of notice, and because often contradictory.
It has received attention from those only whose minds were made up, and
on the assumption that ignorance, superstition, and falsehood, was
sufficient to refute what they had already condemned as ignorance,
superstition, falsehood.
11. The leading purpose of these testimonies was to overthrow the
evidence that the Prophet Joseph possessed the plates, from which he
professed to have translated the Book of Mormon. They have never been
reviewed by his followers; yet our enemies, being the judges, they fail
of their purpose; for it is now admitted, even by Mr. Ferris, late
Secretary of Utah, the ablest writer against the divine mission of the
Prophet Joseph, that he did "exhume one or more of those curious
glyphs, which now figure so largely in the list of American
antiquities," consisting "of metallick plates, covered with
hieroglyphical characters,""written from top to bottom, like the
Chinese, or from side to side indifferently, like the Egyptian and
Demotick Lybian." (Utah and the Mormons, p. 54.)
And Thomas Ford, late Governour of Illinois, though he does not admit
the actual existence of the plates, allows as a probable theory that
the witnesses of the Book of Mormon thought they saw them; and,
consequently, are not false and corrupt, but superstitious and deceived
witnesses. (Ford's History of Illinois, p. 257.)
12. But the grand assault on the Prophetick character of Joseph Smith,
is, that known as the Spaulding story. This is to the effect that the
Rev. Solomon Spaulding, of Conneaut, Ohio, in 1810, wrote a book
entitled, "Manuscript Found," giving a fictitious account of the
emigration of some Jews to America, and their wars, settlements and
national affairs, so as to account for the tumuli and other antiquities
about Conneaut; which manuscript afterwards fell into the hands of
Sidney Rigdon and Joseph Smith, and was by them reconstructed into the
Book of Mormon.
13. The evidence offered to prove this, is, the certificates of seven
witnesses, made in 1833, that they read and heard read the Spaulding
manuscript, in 1810 and 1811, and that, on the introduction of the Book
of Mormon there, subsequent to 1830, when it was first published, they
recognized it as the "Manuscript Found," of Solomon Spaulding, with
which they had been acquainted twenty-two years before.
14. The inference from these facts is, that the Book of Mormon, instead
of being translated from plates, was copied from the Spaulding
manuscript. Now, Conneaut is less than fifty miles from Kirtland, the
gathering place to which the Saints began assembling in 1831. If the
Book of Mormon was such an imposture, could the authors of the
imposture, men who at least had the talent to succeed, have been guilty
of the folly of gathering their disciples so near the scene of their
imposture? It is incredible. A blunder would have got out of the way of
so certain exposure. Men who make such blunders, are never successful
impostors. The leaders had no need to go to Kirtland, before all the
great west, that they should thus set down at the very gate of exposure
and inevitable ruin.
15. So great is the improbability that an impostor would do any such
thing, that it could only be believed on the most overwhelming
evidence. No motive can be imagined sufficient to induce any one to
plagiarize a book, palm it off as an inspiration, build up a Church
upon the imposture, and then transplant that Church bodily several
hundred miles, and locate it only one day's travel, on one of the
greatest thoroughfares of the continent, from where the imposture was
as certain of detection as the sun to rise. Nor could this going to
Kirtland possibly be attributed to accident, or necessity. Smith and
Rigdon pressed it on their followers.
16. The testimony of the witnesses ought to be read and judged, with a
view to this exceeding improbability; and the genuineness of their
certificates ought to be looked after with the suspicion engendered by
the examination of the former set, accumulated by the same author.
17. Solomon Spaulding was educated at Plainfield Academy and Dartmouth
College, and had studied Law and Divinity, and preached several years.
(Howe's History of Mormonism,p. 279.)
His style must have been good. From his enterprise, his tastes and
habits, and especially his fondness for reading and writing, it was
probably highly cultivated. The style of the Book of Mormon is
exceedingly barbarous, probably more ungrammatical, and worse English,
than any other book in the language which ever went through a second
edition, carrying upon the face of almost every page those peculiar
Yankeeisms which a man of education never speaks, much less writes; and
proves that whoever rendered it in English, whether author or
translator, was very ignorant of the language. It may be said not to be
translated, strictly, into English, but into a barbarous Yankee tongue,
familiar to the uneducated of the last generation, but now nearly
forgotten.
18. Yet these very marks of great ignorance of the English language, in
either author or translator, are the marks by which the witnesses
pretend to identify the work. Henry Lake certifies to telling Spaulding
that the frequent use of the words, "and it came to pass," sounded
ridiculous. Unquestionably it does; and for that reason Solomon
Spaulding could not have so written. He could not have written in that
style, to imitate the Bible, as some have said; for that language
occurs many times as often as in the Bible, and could only have
originated in a very barbarous language, having an exceedingly limited
vocabulary.
19. The witnesses also remember that the names of Nephi, Lehi, and
others found in the Book of Mormon, occurred frequently in the
Spaulding manuscript. Twentytwo years, the time elapsing between
hearing the Spaulding manuscript read, and reading the Book of Mormon,
is a long time to remember the mere fictitious names, interwoven in a
romance, and the place where they are interwoven in dreams of fancy.
The names might be remembered, with being in Spaulding'S manuscript;
for they originated some thousand years earlier, (Jud. xv, 9, 14. 1st
Chron. v, 19. 2d Mac. i, 39,) and were in familiar use in the days of
Samson and Nehemiah, though few readers of these names now remember
where they have read them.
20. One of the witnesses, Henry Lake, tells of an inconsistency in the
tragick account of Laban, contained in Spaulding'S manuscript, and also
in the book of Mormon, which he pointed out to Spaulding, and he
promised to correct; (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 282;)
certainly a very strong circumstance, except for the material fact that
the inconsistency is not pointed out, and does not exist.
21. Another witness, John N. Miller, whose memory is so tenacious as to
recognize "many passages in the Book of Mormon as verbatim from
Spaulding, and others in fact," and to "find in it the writings of
Solomon Spaulding from beginning to end," recognized it by "some
humorous passages," which Spaulding frequently read to company. (Howe's
History of Mormonism, p. 283.) As there is not a humorous passage in the Book of Mormon, his testimony, if, indeed, he ever gave it, will go for nothing.
22. Another witness, Oliver Smith, remembers that Spaulding'S
manuscript gave an account of the arts, sciences, and civilization of
the first settlers of America. (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 235
[sic].) But the Book of Mormon contains none of these things. There is
not only no history of these things in the Book of Mormon, but they are
so slightly alluded to in any way, that it is impossible to know what
arts and sciences existed among the people whose history is there
recorded; and the opinion prevails that they were in a state of
semibarbarism, because their history consists of little but
emigrations, settlements, religion and wars.
23. They generally agree that the religious part of the Book of Mormon
is not Spaulding's, and that his object was to account for the
antiquities found so abundantly about Conneaut, by writing a romance
which should be a plausible history of their origin. Now the Book of
Mormon does not in any way account for the origin of those works. It
does not place one of its scenes in that region, nor give account of
the construction of any similar structures, nor does it appear by it
that any person mentioned in the Book of Mormon ever saw or heard of
the great Lakes of North America, or ever approached the Lake region,
or the region of its peculiar class of antiquities, except as a
fugitive, near the closing scenes of the book. And if the religious
part of the book was taken out, most of it would be lacking, including
every leading fact in the history of all those men whose names these
veracious witnesses so well remember.
24. Had testimony like this been given in open Court, upon a regular
examination and cross examination of witnesses, no judicious mind would
have deemed the case made out. But when it was picked up by a lawyer,
in exparte examinations of witnesses opposed with religious zeal to the
cause he is attacking, it amounts to nothing at all. The plan once set
on foot, it is a matter of surprise that so bald a case is made out.
25. Unable to get certificates signed to his own satisfaction,
Howe has added an unsigned certificate of one witness, Artemas
Cunningham, (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 286,)
and numerous unsupported statements of his own, of what various other
persons said and would have said if he could have found them, and asks
the world on such exparte, unsworn, unsupported, contradictory,
incredible and impertinent testimony and hearsay to believe the Book of
Mormon was plagiarized from Spaulding's romance. Against the
credibility of any part of the testimony that the Book of Mormon was
plagiarized from the "Manuscript Found," is the overwhelming fact that,
in 1832, Orson Hyde introduced the Book of Mormon at Conneaut,
(New Salem, Ohio,) and there preached and built up a numerous Church
among Spaulding's old neighbours, many of whom were familiar with his
"Manuscript Found." They could not be deceived, and could have no
possible inducement to establish themselves and their children and
friends in a delusion.
26. But there was still another difficulty to encounter; that is, to
show by what possibility Joseph smith could have become possessed of
Spaulding's manuscript. If it was unquestionably shown that he held it,
it would be a question of no consequence how he came by it. But while
the testimony that the Book of Mormon was plagiarized, was defective,
it was at least necessary to show that Spaulding's manuscript might by
possibility have fallen into Smith's hands.
27. So important did Howe deem this portion of his undertaking, that he
traced up the family of Spaulding from Conneaut, through Pittsburgh and
Amity, in Pennsylvania, Onondaga and Otsego counties, in New York, and
from there to the State of Massachusetts, where he found Spaulding's
widow, and learned that she had left a trunk of Spaulding's manuscripts
in Otsego county, New York. (Howe's History of Mormonism, pp. 287, 288.)
28. The light began to break. Here was a chance to prove the imposture
by bringing forward the very book, written by Spaulding in 1811, which
Joseph was pretending to translate in 1829. The trunk was opened, and
in it was found "a romance, purporting to have been translated from the
Latin, found on twentyfour rolls of parchment in a cave, on the banks
of Conneaut Creek." (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 288.)
29. What further was done, Howe does not see fit to tell. He says, that
this was the wrong manuscript; suggests that Spaulding had altered the
plan of his book, thrown this by and written it over again, and that it
was the rewritten manuscript which Smith had plagiarized; says he
showed this manuscript to several witnesses, who had already certified
to the identity of the Book of Mormon, with the Spaulding manuscript,
who excused themselves of a lie by saying, that Spaulding "told them he
had altered his plan of writing." (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 288.)
That such an alteration was actually made, is possible; for though Howe
omits all mention of it, the testimony of the widow (then Matilda
Davison) and daughter of Spaulding (Mrs. McKinstry) published
in the Quincy Whig, shows clearly that the genuine duly entitled
"Manuscript Found" was delivered personally to Hulburt, Howe's agent,
in 1834, at Monson, Massachusetts.
30. Failing thus to identify the works, he returns to the important
task of showing that by possibility Smith could have possessed himself
of the "Manuscript Found." And on this point he asserts this, no more:
that the widow thinks the manuscript was once taken to the printing
office of Patterson and Lambdin, at Pittsburgh; (Howe's History of
Mormonism, p. 287;)
that Lambdin is dead, and, therefore, cannot testify, and Patterson
does not know anything whatever on the subject. (ibid., p. 289.)
31. This is absolutely all that he pretends to have made out. Here starts
conjecture; that as Rigdon
came to Pittsburgh,
in 1823 or 1824; is said to have been intimate with Lambdin, studied
the Bible, went into the Western Reserve, Ohio, and commenced preaching
there the Campbellite doctrine, then new, and contained in the Book of
Mormon, as well as the Bible, about the same time that the veracious
Palmyra witnesses have Smith engaged in money digging, tavern lounging,
and vagrancy, Lambdin must have surreptitiously copied Spaulding's
manuscript; Rigdon must have stolen Lambdin's copy; rewrote it to suit
his purpose; and in some of his long clerical visits to Pittsburgh,
struck off three hundred and fifty miles, through the wild byways of
the Alleghany mountains and the Susquehannah River, to where the boy
vagrant Joe was digging money, and employed him to found a new
religion. (Howe's History of Mormonism,
pp. 289, 290.)
32. This is the whole case, as made out by Howe, in his Mormonism Unveiled,
in 1834. This work, under the title of
History of Mormonism,
has gone through numerous editions since; but all end here. Time has
not added one word. The friend and assistant of Howe, Philastus
Hulburt, spent a full year in tracing up the Spaulding manuscript, and
accumulating testimonies, guesses and forgeries, of which the latter
make the largest share. What does it make out? Unanswered, is there
enough of it to raise a suspicion? If suspicion was already awakened,
is there anything to confirm it. Does not the meagerness of the case,
and the suspicious character of the testimonies, damn the accusers?
33. Though this tale was swallowed by those who were ready to believe
anything against the Prophet, either with or without evidence, there
were those who saw the necessity of obtaining something in the shape of
testimony. Resort was had to Mrs. Davison, late widow of the late
Solomon Spaulding, to see if in her waning years her memory had not
brightened.
34. Austin, of Monson, and Storrs, of Hollister [sic], Massachusetts, visited the widow of Spaulding, and after obtaining what information they could, drew up a letter,
to which Austin signed her name, agreeing in some minor features with
Howe's History, but stating that Spaulding did exhibit "his manuscript
to Patterson, who was much pleased with it, and borrowed it for
perusal," and after retaining "it a long time, informed Mr. Spaulding,
that, if he would make out a title page and preface, he would publish
it;" and also that the manuscript was carefully preserved by her till
Hulburt (Howe's agent) called upon her for it, in Monson,
Massachusetts, in 1834; contrary to Howe, who makes her say she "has no
distinct knowledge of its contents," "and is quite uncertain whether it
was ever brought back from Patterson and Lambdin's printing office."
(Howe's History of Mormonism, pp. 287, 288.)
35. This letter alleges that "Sidney Rigdon was at that time (which she
makes some time previous to 1815) connected with the printing office of
Patterson and Lambdin;" and that the manuscript was returned to Mr.
Spaulding, when he removed to Washington county, where he died, in
1816, and that she took it with her, and it has been frequently read by
her daughter, Mrs. Mckinstry, of Monson, Massachusetts, and other
friends, till 1834, when Philastus Hulburt (Howe's assistant) came,
introduced by her old neighbours, Henry Lake, Aaron Wright, and others,
to get it for the purpose of comparison with the Book of Mormon. This
letter was published in the Episcopal Recorder, of Sept. 12, 1840, the Philadelphia Saturday Courier, of Nov. 16, 1842, and the newspapers generally.
36. This so far contradicted Howe's version, in the attempt to make a
stronger case, that numerous persons called on the widow and daughter
of Spaulding, in Monson, to make personal inquiries. Among them, Mr.
John Haven, of Hollister, Middlesex county, Massachusetts, published
in the Quincy Whig a letter stating that the widow says she never
signed the letter published over her name, and never saw it till after
its publication, and had no agency in the origin of it, except
answering some questions asked by D. R. Austin, who afterwards wrote
the letter, without her authority.
37. But she states the important fact, that she delivered the original
manuscript to Philastus Hulburt, the associate of Howe, on an agreement
of his to publish it, and give her half the profits; and that she
"subsequently received a letter, stating that it did not read as they
expected, and they should not publish it."
38. In Howe's History of Mormonism, the fact that the real Spaulding
manuscript was in the author's hands, was covered by a very thin veil.
It is difficult to read the published letter in the name of Spaulding's
widow without perceiving that fact, though it is not positively stated.
But here it comes out clear and distinct.
39. Howe, when he published the History of the Mormons, had the Spaulding manuscript
entire and unmutilated before him. He had employed an agent to travel
more than one thousand miles, in tracing it up; got possession of it,
and compared it line by line with the Book of Mormon. Had there been
one page which agreed, he would have copied it in his "Mormonism
Unveiled," as the unanswerable evidence that Joseph Smith was an
impostor, and the Book of Mormon a plagiarism. "It did not read as they
expected." The Conneaut witnesses were dishonest, or mistaken. This is
the bitter end of the Spaulding story.
40. But it may not be amiss to set down some additional facts, showing
that the whole body of those who had a hand in making and propagating
it, were willing to resort to falsehood. In the letter extensively
published over the name of Spaulding's widow, she is made to say,
"Sidney Rigdon, (one of the founders of the sect,) who has figured so
largely in the History of the Mormons, was, at that time, 1812, '13 and
'14, connected with the printing office of Mr. Patterson, as is well
known in that region."
41. Now, Spaulding went to Pittsburgh in 1812, and remained but two
years. (Howe's History of Mormonism, pp. 282, 287.) And Rigdon did not
go to Pittsburgh till 1823 or 1824. (Howe's History of Mormonism, p.
289.) So that at least nine years before Rigdon ever visited
Pittsburgh, the manuscript was returned to Spaulding; for the widow, in
the same letter, certifies that "the manuscript was returned to the
author, who soon after removed to Amity, Washington county,
Pennsylvania, where he died in 1816. The manuscript then fell into" her
"hands, and was preserved carefully. It has frequently been examined
by" her "daughter, Mrs. McKinstry, of Monson, Massachusetts, and by
other friends."
42. Moreover, if Rigdon had been connected with Patterson's printing office, that fact could have been proved by Patterson himself.
And it was a very important fact for Howe, in making his case. Howe did
apply to Patterson for information, and learned that Rigdon arrived at
Pittsburgh in 1823 or 1824, but did not learn that he was ever in the
printing office for one moment. And it otherwise appears that the firm
was dissolved, and the business closed long before that time. The only
inference is, that, in endeavoring to supply a known vacuum in the
evidence, Austin and Storrs set down this falsehood in the letter, to
which they set her name, without any authority whatever.
43. To set this question fully at rest, John E. Page, while in
Apostolick charge of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints,
in Pittsburgh, in 1843, published a book
on this Spaulding story, in which he furnishes numerous affidavits,
certificates and testimonials that Rigdon was but fifteen years old
when Spaulding went to Pittsburgh, and but seventeen when he left
there, and was all that time at work on his father's farm, and that he
remained there employed only at farm labour till 1819, five years after
Spaulding left Pittsburgh, and three after his death; and that the
Spaulding manuscript was in the continual keeping of Spaulding, Mrs.
Spaulding and their daughter, from when it left Patterson's office, in
1812, 1813, or 1814, when Rigdon was a farm boy in the back country, of
fifteen to seventeen years, till 1834, when it was put into the hands
of Hulburt, the agent of Howe, to be published as an expose of the
plagiarism of the Book of Mormon.
44. This work of Page's, issued of the very scene of action, all its
statements supported by the testimony of witnesses then living at and
in the vicinity of Pittsburgh, distributed by thousands, and
challenging investigation, no man ever attempted to answer. Not a
position or an assertion in it was ever attacked. Not a man can be
found on earth who, after reading it, pretended to believe the
Spaulding story. Not a man can be found in Pittsburgh who pretends that
Rigdon was ever in Patterson and Lambdin's printing office, or ever saw Lambdin.
45. Not only is there this entire failure to trace the Spaulding
manuscript to Rigdon, but there has never been the first step made
towards tracing it from Rigdon to Smith. In the investigation which so
grave a question has called out, both Rigdon and Smith have been
traced, step by step, from their cradles till after the publication of
the Book of Mormon: and not an iota of evidence has been produced that
they were ever within three hundred miles of each other; or that either
of them had any kind of fame or notoriety by which the other could by
possibility have heard of his existence, until after Joseph translated
the Book of Mormon.
46. While the matter was yet fresh in the publick mind, Rigdon, through the newspapers,
denied having ever seen or heard of Spaulding, or his manuscript;
denied having any connection with, or knowledge of, Patterson and
Lambdin's printing office, or any acquaintance with Lambdin; and challenged investigation at Pittsburgh, where plenty of witnesses could be found to contradict him, if his statements were not true.
47. Patterson remained there, an influential citizen, and a respectable
member of a Christian Church. In 1842, Rev. S. Williams, of Pittsburgh,
undertook the task of supplying the lacking evidence, and published a work
called, "Mormonism Exposed," in which he failed to produce a single
witness that Rigdon had any connection with the printing office, or
Lambdin.
48. Though eight years before, when Howe's History of Mormonism was
published, Patterson had no recollection of any such manuscript,
(Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 289,) he now certifies that some
gentleman from the east did bring there a singular manuscript, chiefly
in the style of the Old English Bible, of which he read a few pages.
But unfortunately for our accusers, he certifies
that the manuscript was committed, not to Lambdin, but to Silas Engles,
a man of most excellent character, who had charge of the entire
concerns of the office; was a good scholar, and an excellent printer,
to whose decision was entrusted even the question of the morality and
scholarship of works offered for publication; and that Engles, after a
few weeks, returned the manuscript to its author.
49. The sum of the facts, therefore, is this: 1st. The testimony
offered to prove that the Book of Mormon has any similarity to
Spaulding's "Manuscript Found," is of the most doubtful character;
quite as likely to be forged as genuine; and, if genuine, more likely
to be false than true. 2d. The original, unmutilated "Manuscript
Found," was in the hands of E. D. Howe, of Painesville, Ohio, in 1834,
when he first published his History of Mormonism, and was by him
suppressed, because there was no resemblance between it and the Book of
Mormon. 3d. There is no evidence that Lambdin ever saw or heard of the
Spaulding manuscript. Patterson's testimony shows it improbable that he
saw it; impossible that he copied it. 4th. If Lambdin had it, it is so
improbable that Rigdon ever saw or heard of it, as to be next to a
certainty that he did not. 5th. If Rigdon had it, it is impossible that
he ever transferred it to Joseph Smith, or ever heard of him, until
after the translation of the Book of Mormon.
50. Complete as is this failure, every subsequent writer has, for want
of any other means of attack, fallen back on this. But it is
marvellous, how men in high standing have filled up with their own
assertions every defect in the chain of evidence, and lopped off every
contradiction and inconsistency; reserving to themselves as much of the
lie as had the semblance of truth, and adding what was necessary to
perfect the falsehood.
GUNNISON'S HISTORY OF THE MORMONS.
51. Gunnison, in his History of the Mormons, (p. 94,) says, that when the "Manuscript Found" was put in the hands of Lambdin,
the printer, "Sidney Rigdon was employed to edit it for the press." No
writer, no witness had ever asserted this; but it was necessary to make
out the case, and he volunteered the falsehood, not knowing the fact,
that at that time Rigdon was only a farmer's boy of fifteen, and that
it was Engles instead of Lambdin who had the manuscript.
52. In the attempt, however, to show that the boy Joe had such a
reputation as a money digger, at Palmyra, New York, that Rigdon, at
Pittsburgh, four hundred miles away, heard of him, and intrusted to him
the scheme of founding a new religion, Gunnison breaks down and admits
it incredible. (Gunnison's History of the Mormons, p. 94.)
53. Gunnison then asserts, that from 1817, to 1820, the trunk supposed
to contain the manuscript was at the house of the widow Spaulding's
"brother, in Onondaga Hollow, (Onondaga county, New York,) near the
residence of the Smiths; (Palmyra, Wayne county, New York;) Wayne and
Onondaga counties being separated by a narrow township of land."
(Gunnison's History of the Mormons, p. 95.)
54. Now, it is a fact that the whole breadth of Cayuga county lies
between Onondaga on the east, and Wayne on the west; that Onondaga
Hollow is in the east part of Onondaga county, and Palmyra, the
residence of the Smiths, in the west part of Wayne, making the
residence of Smith some eighty miles from Onondaga Hollow. As Smith was
but twelve years old at that time, the inference of Gunnison that he
smelled out a manuscript eighty miles off, and stole and laid it by to
use in founding a new religion, at some future day, is not very
forcible. He would need a revelation, at least, to guide him in finding
it.
55. But Gunnison's premises are fatal in still another point. He
locates Spaulding's manuscript at Onondaga Hollow, from 1817 to 1820,
(History of the Mormons, p. 95,) during all which time the Smith family, according to Howe, lived at Royalton, Vermont, (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 11,)
two hundred and eighty miles from Onondaga Hollow. If Howe's authority
is not good for the residence of the Smiths, it is not for the
Spaulding story. If it is, Gunnison's conclusions are worse than
worthless.
56. Though Howe's History of Mormonism, which Gunnison principally
followed, almost shows Spaulding's manuscript in Howe's hands, the
letter of Spaulding's widow, published in the newspapers generally,
from 1839 to 1842, showed that she had it in her possession from her
husband's death till Hulburt, the agent of Howe, came after it, in
1834, and that her daughter, and other friends in Monson, were in the
habit of reading it, down till that time, and leaves the reader with
the impression that she delivered it to Hulburt, for Howe's use; and
the testimony of both the widow and daughter, published in the Quincy
Whig, and extensively republished, most positively asserts that it was
so delivered to Hulburt, on an agreement to publish it, and that they
received a letter from those having it in charge that they should not
publish it, because it did not read as they expected; Gunnison ventures
the assertion that, ever since the Book of Mormon appeared, the
"Manuscript Found has been the manuscript lost;" and apparently
oppressed with his own theory, that Smith at the age of twelve had been
inspired with the knowledge of its existence in an old trunk eighty
miles away, and stolen it; still guesses that by accident or design it
got into Smith's hands in some way. (Gunnison's History of the Mormons,
p. 95.)
57. The testimony of both the widow and daughter that the manuscript of
Spaulding was only about one quarter as large as the printed Book of
Mormon, and, therefore, contained but about one twentieth the reading
matter, neither Howe, Gunnison or any other writer has noticed.
58. But Gunnison claims, that, notwithstanding the barbarous style of
language in which the Book of Mormon is rendered, it is really a work
of genius of the highest order. (Gunnison's History of the Mormons, pp.
95, 96.) One eighteenth, he says, is copied from the Bible. If the
whole of Spaulding's manuscript was copied in it, it would make but one
twentieth, and something like nine tenths would remain the work of
Smith. A little singular it is that the unlettered Joe and the learned
Solomon Spaulding should have the same masterly and commanding genius,
and write in the same barbarous style.
FORD'S HISTORY OF ILLINOIS.
59. Governour Ford, in his History of Illinois, jumps over all the
difficulties, and without pretending to any information beyond what
Howe's History contains, makes the sweeping and unsupported assertion
that "Rigdon had become possessed of a religious romance, written by a
Presbyterian Clergyman, in Ohio, then dead, which suggested the idea of
starting a new religion. It was agreed that Joe Smith should be put
forward as Prophet; and the two devised the story that golden plates
had been found, containing a record inscribed on them in unknown
characters, which, when deciphered by the power of inspiration, gave
the history of the ten lost tribes of Israel." (Ford's History of
Illinois, p. 252.)
60. Not a new witness is introduced; not a new fact is ascertained. No
attempt is made to trace either Smith or Rigdon one step of the way
over the three hundred miles of country between them. No attempt is
made to show how Rigdon in Pittsburgh, heard of the boy Joe, whose fame
for money digging extended throughout a quarter of the township of
Manchester, [Manchester, ontario county, adjoins Palmyra, Wayne county,
and was part of the time the place of Smith's residence] in central New
York; or how he learned of the preacher Rigdon, who, as a Baptist
preacher, was known for near twenty miles out of Pittsburgh, in
southwestern Pennsylvania. None of these little particulars trouble the
Governour in his attempt to blacken the fame of the Prophet, the easier
to vindicate the crime of conniving at his murder.
61. Conjectures, of which he could not possibly know anything, which
other men had for twenty years ransacked half the continent to find
some evidence of, he simply asserts as though they were unquestionable
facts.
62. Like most men who bear false witness, he has made his falsehood
patent. The Book of Mormon does not contain "the history of the ten
lost tribes," as he asserts; as any one will see by reading the book;
and whoever will assert such a falsehood, when the truth is so easily
known, whether from carelessness or corruption, is not a safe
historian, on disputed questions, of which he has no personal
knowledge.
ILLUSTRATED HISTORY OF THE MORMONS.
63. The anonymous author of the Illustrated History of the Mormons,
though more just than most writers on that side, falls into the common
and unsupported falsehood, by saying that Rigdon was a "compositor;"
that is, a type setter, (p.45,) but without one word of evidence to justify the assertion.
64. The same author falls in with the general fame of the Spaulding
story, without investigating it, and says, "Joseph Smith and Sidney
Rigdon seem to have acted in concert in its concoction, from materials
thus prepared for them." (Illustrated History of the Mormons, p. 49.)
This book was written in England, though published by Derby and Miller,
Auburn, New York, and as it is not characterized with the usual
virulence, possibly the author had only heard the general statement of
the Spaulding story, without those details which utterly overthrow it.
65. In the same manner he is led to say that "anachronisms are
frequent" in the Book of Mormon; (Illustrated History of Mormonism, p.
49;) though not a single one is pointed out, for the best reason in the
world; none exists. This fact does not rest on testimony, but can be
tested at any time by an examination of the book.
HOWE'S GREAT WEST.
66. Henry Howe
published, at Cincinnati, in 1854, a History of the Great West, in
which he revives the Spaulding story, with the theory that Rigdon first
heard of Joseph Smith as a vagabond money digger, subsequent to 1827,
when Rigdon was a Campbellite preacher, in Mentor, Ohio, and Smith
resided near Palmyra, New York.
67. No evidence is offered that Rigdon had the Spaulding manuscript, or
that he had ever heard of Smith. The only attempt to show either of
these things possible, is the statement that "Rigdon was frequently
absent." (Great West, p. 337.)
68. As Rigdon did not go to Mentor till after Smith was engaged of the
Book of Mormon, the suggestion that he there heard of him, and on the
faith of his vagabond character, entrusted him with the commission of
sole founder of a new religion, of which Rigdon was to come in as
junior partner, after the first rugged paths were trod, comes too late.
69. And against the suggestion that Rigdon heard of him at all, till
the publication of the Book of Mormon, in the newspapers, is the fact
that Mentor, Ohio, is two hundred and thirty miles from Palmyra or
Manchester, New York, and in the twenty-two years search which has been
made for some evidence of a possible collusion between Smith and
Rigdon, previous to the publication of the Book of Mormon, not a
witness has been produced who could show that any person residing
twenty miles from Smith ever heard of him till the annunciation,
through the newspapers, of the publication of that book.
70. That Rigdon, as a Campbellite preacher at Mentor, was occasionally
absent from home, is too probable to require any proof; but that that
fact, equally true of every Christian minister, convicts him of
stealing manuscripts to found a new religion on, or of dealing with
vagrant money diggers, hundreds of miles away, is a new rule of
evidence, to which all other Christian ministers will object.
71. The town of Mentor is only five miles from the town of Kirtland,
and Rigdon was the minister of the Campbellite Churches in both towns,
and after receiving the faith of the Latter Day Saints, remained at
Kirtland till 1837; and till 1848 was prominently connected with all
the publick discussions of that faith. Had he at any time previous to
the publication of the Book of Mormon made a journey from Mentor to
Palmyra, and stopped with Joseph long enough to commit to him the
charge of founding a new religion, and the reconstruction of the
Spaulding manuscript into an oracle of God, why has no one of the
Cambellites about Mentor and Kirtland any knowledge of his going to
Palmyra, or of his being absent of some unknown journey, long enough to
have accomplished that work?
72. For twentytwo years, since the Spaulding story was first
promulgated, as far as Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon have been
preached, all Christendom has looked earnestly and with painful anxiety
for some such proof, and have looked in vain. Had he made a single
journey from Mentor, in which he could not be traced step by step, and
his employment proved day by day, so as to show the impossibility of
his having visited the Seer of Palmyra, that absence would have been
announced, and proclaimed the triumph of his accusers.
73. It is obvious that Henry Howe had not investigated the matter at
all, but only followed common fame, guessing his way through
difficulties, which were apparent on the face of E. D. Howe's History
of Mormonism. His theory of the plagiarism of the Book of Mormon, is
built on the exploded work of E. D. Howe, altered, but not improved, by
his own guessing.
FERRIS' UTAH AND THE MORMONS.
74. Of all the writers who have given currency to the Spaulding story,
the most able and at the same time the most unscrupulous and corrupt,
is Benjamin G. Ferris, late Secretary of Utah, author of a book
entitled, "Utah and the Mormons." Ferris not only repeats the old
exploded lie, that Rigdon was a printer, but says that at the time
Spaulding's manuscript was in Patterson and Lambdin's printing office,
Rigdon "was in the employment of Patterson, and became so much
interested in the 'Manuscript Found' as to copy it, 'as he himself has
frequently stated.'" (Utah and the Mormons, p. 52.)
75. Such unblushing falsehood it would be difficult elsewhere to find.
At the date of Ferris publication, the Spaulding story had been twenty
years published. Every effort in the power of man had been made to show
the "Manuscript Found" in Rigdon's possession, or where he might
possibly have seen it, and so far in vain. Rigdon had presided over a
Church of three thousand Latter Day Saints, in Pittsburgh; and in the
anxiety to destroy his influence, the Rev. Mr. Williams, pastor of a
Church in Pittsburgh, aided by the whole clergy, had published a work
for the purpose of fastening this plagiarism on Rigdon; and not a
witness could be found to say that Rigdon was a printer; not a witness
that he was ever in Patterson and Lambdin's office; not a witness that
he was ever in Pittsburgh, while that printing office existed; and not
a witness that he ever saw or heard of either Spaulding or his
manuscript, previous to the publication of Mormonism Unveiled, in 1834.
76. But that is not the darkest feature in this allegation of Mr.
Ferris. In saying that Rigdon "became so much interested in the
'Manuscript Found' as to copy it, 'as he himself has frequently
stated,'" including the last six words in quotations, as though he had
copied them from some other writer, Ferris is guilty both of a known
falsehood, and an unblushing forgery. (Utah and the Mormons, p. 52.)
77. No man on earth had ever so written. Ferris did not copy his quoted
words from any other writer, and it is patent on the pages of his book
that he had read and was familiar with those works, on this question,
in which Rigdon and his friends have continually denied that Rigdon
ever saw or heard of Spaulding, or his manuscript, earlier than 1834,
and challenged the world to produce one word of proof against him.
78. Pursuing this course of falsehood, even when truth would seem to
serve his purpose just as well, Ferris accounts for the meagerness of
the evidence against Smith and Rigdon, by asserting the death of
Patterson in 1826, four years before the publication of the Book of
Mormon. (Utah and the Mormons, p. 52.)
79. Yet the Rev. S. Williams published, in the city of Pittsburgh, the
residence of Patterson, in the year 1842, a pamphlet entitled,
Mormonism Exposed, containing a certificate
concerning this same Spaulding manuscript, signed by this same Robert
Patterson, and dated April 2d, 1842. And John E. Page, then residing in
Pittsburgh, in Apostolick charge of the Latter Day Saints, and
abundantly able and disposed to expose Williams, if he introduced any
false testimonies, published a pamphlet in reply, and admits
Patterson's certificate into his work without question. Patterson was
living, and a prominent citizen of Pittsburgh sixteen years after
Ferris writes him dead. And no writer, no man, before Ferris, said he
was dead. Ferris is the original author of the falsehood. And this fact
does not rest on the assumption of any man. If he had any authority, he
has but to produce it. There is none.
80. But with his unscrupulous corruption, Ferris was too shrewd not to
see that the theory which says that Rigdon heard of Smith's fame as a
money digger, three or four hundred miles away, and looked him up as a
suitable person to employ, to found a new religion, was ridiculous;
that some new invention was necessary; or, when passion was over, every
sane man would reject the wicked impeachment.
81. Drawing upon his imagination alone, and asserting each point as
though it was an unquestioned fact in history, Ferris says, "In the
course of his wanderings, Smith met with Rigdon. These two men together
conceived the idea of starting a system of religious imposture,
commensurate with the popular credulity.
82. "Conjointly they possessed, in mercantile phrase, the requisite
capital for such an adventure. Smith had cunning, plausible volubility,
Seer stones, mysterious antiquities, and, withal, the prestige of
success; Rigdon was versed in the lights and shadows of religious
verbiage; had some literary pretensions; was a printer; and, above all,
had a copy of Spaulding's book.
83. "Which started the bright idea of the golden Bible, is not known;
though, in all likelihood, the credit is due to Smith, as he ever after
maintained the ascendency in the new hierarchy. After the plan had
assumed a definite form in the minds of the originators, it was easy
for Joseph, in his perambulations, to trace out and secure the original
manuscript of Spaulding, to guard the intended scheme from exposure."
(Utah and the Mormons, pp. 55, 56.)
84. Thus, without spending one moment in inquiry, without even
troubling himself to pick up such facts as were in his reach, much less
inquiring for evidence, which twenty years of the most industrious
research had failed to find, Ferris sits down in his armed chair, and
on a half page of foolscap, demonstrates by his unsupported assertion,
not only that Rigdon had a copy of the Spaulding manuscript, but that
Smith, while hazing around with peep stones, and mineral rods, strayed
off from Palmyra, three or four hundred miles, to Pittsburgh, and to
look up Rigdon as a partner; as tradition says, the head of a severed
snake will look up his eliminated tail, which some mischievous boy has
cut off and hidden in the most secret place; but that Smith absolutely
traced up the original manuscript, and got possession of that also.
85. Surely, the millions of Christians who had anxiously waited twenty
years for some scrap of evidence, that either Smith or Rigdon ever
heard of the Spaulding manuscript previous to 1834, ought to be
thankful to Ferris, for alleging all they wish to prove, and saving the
necessity of evidence. Henceforth no one need trouble himself to prove
that Rigdon obtained a copy of the manuscript, for any one can prove by
Ferris' falsehood that Smith had the original, without obligation to
the copy.
86. Why two men, obscure as Smith and Rigdon, each entertaining the
ambition to found a new religion, should curb their zeal, till blindly
burrowing like the mole, through the three hundred miles of intervening
country, they embraced each other; why the entire task of accomplishing
the work should be put upon the most inefficient of the two; why their
two minds were so perfectly agreed, that, while one secured a copy, the
other secured the original of Spaulding's manuscript, Mr. Ferris must
tell; nobody else can.
87. But, why no other writer ever asserted this, why Ferris does not
offer one word of proof in support of it, is very plain. Anybody can
tell that. It is because there is not a word of truth in it.
88. As if to test the gullability of his readers, and prove how far the
Christian world would be satisfied with falsehoods which a schoolboy
could detect, so they militated against the divine mission of Joseph
Smith, Ferris takes pains to prove that Smith "came into the northern
part of Pennsylvania, near the Susquehannah River, in which part his
father-in-law resided," and then, to show that Smith might by
possibility have found Rigdon there, he adds, "Sidney Rigdon, it will
also be recollected, resided in the State of Pennsylvania." (Utah and
the Mormons, p. 61.)
89. True, Rigdon did once reside in Pennsylvania, but it was the other
side of the Alleghany mountains, and by the nearest road, meandering
around the mountains and through their gorges, more than four hundred
miles distant, and he had removed still further off into the State of
Ohio, before Smith went into Pennsylvania at all. (Howe's History of
Mormonism, p. 289.)
90. Pursuing his investigation with unblushing knavery and consummate
skill, Ferris rakes over every document he can find, whether forged or
genuine, supplying every apparent lack by his own fruitful invention,
and laying especial stress upon every ebullition of passion of any of
the disciples of Joseph Smith, during a period of a quarter of a
century, to impeach the moral characters of the witnesses of the Book
of Mormon; and sums up, that by their enemies they were held "very much
below par;" and that among themselves a petulent editor, on some
disagreement, called Martin Harris a lackey; and that when Oliver
Cowdery and David Whitmer had some business connection with the set of
men who expelled the Saints from Missouri, Rigdon accused them with
being "connected with a gang of thieves, counterfeiters, liars and
blacklegs, of the deepest die." (Utah and the Mormons, pp. 68, 69.)
91. This is the same set of men who, in 1838, expelled the Latter Day
Saints from Missouri, and in 1854 invaded Kansas, for the purpose of
expelling the free State men; David R. Atchison, late member and
President of the United States Senate, being the leader in both forays.
And though Atchison's men in either case stopped at no crime, it is
certain that many men of the highest standing in the United States have
had much more connection with them than Cowdery and Whitmer were
accused of, in those hours of Peril in which they were unfortunately
separated from their brethren.
92. A fact worth all the rest is, that in all those changes which
separated the early ministers of this persecuted faith, even when
Joseph and many of his faithful brethren were in prison, and the dead
bodies of others lying around unburied, and Cowdery and Whitmer in the
camp of their persecutors, they still gave the same unvarying testimony
of the divine authority of the dispensation and the Book of Mormon;
both relating circumstantially, on oath, in a Missouri court, faced and
browbeaten by a Missouri mob, the fact of the exhibition of the plates
to them according to their testimony in the Book of Mormon.
93. And Cowdery, under the same circumstances, knowing that he was cast
out and hated by his brethren as a traitor, who had joined their
enemies and imperiled their lives, testified, on his solemn oath, that
Joseph and himself did receive the Priesthood on two different
occasions, by the voice of God, and the hands of Angels; relating
circumstantially the time and manner of it; knowing well, when he did
so, that the Missourians would turn against him more bitterly than his
brethren had, and that the best hope which remained for him, was to
flee secretly for his life.
94. Though most of the witnesses of the Book of Mormon were, one time
and another, separated from the Church, not one of them ever drew back
from his testimony, or departed from the faith; and notwithstanding the
violent hatred engendered by internal discord among brethren, which
grew up against some of them at the time of their separation, they have
all lived down scandal and reproach, and by their irreproachable lives
have established an unimpeachable reputation for integrity and truth,
both among Saints and Gentiles.
95. The reputation of Joseph, as a money digger, and a peep stone Seer,
originated in falsehood, and has been kept up for the purpose of
ridiculing his calling to the Prophetick office. The truth about it is,
that as a day labourer he was employed at wages to dig, not for
enchanted treasures, but for money, which tradition said some Spaniards
had buried in the bank of the Susquehannah River. (Gunnison's History
of the Mormons, p. 92. Pratt's Ancient American Records.)
96. The various jokes about money digging, which from this fact passed
between him and his early associates, were industriously gathered up by
Philastus Hulburt, duly embellished and made a part of Howe's "History
of Mormonism:" and the affidavits there accumulated, if they prove
anything, prove only ignorance, superstition, and the most venial
offences, of which the witnesses bring in themselves for the largest
share, and leave the reader with the impression that if what they say
of Smith is really true, he was rather guilty of an occasional
practical joke on their superstition, than of any participation in it.
97. Nothing is more evident, notwithstanding the pains taken to conceal
it, than that many of them believed Joseph had the plates, from which
he professed to be translating; and one of the witnesses, Willard
Chase, testifies that, notwithstanding Joseph's anxiety to make his
possession of the plates a secret, as many as twelve men did get to see
them. (Howe's History of Mormonism, p. 245.) And many of the witnesses
who testify that he was not a man of truth, show, nevertheless, that
they and others did credit him in matters which, to say the least of
it, were a severe tax on one's credulity.
98. The true test of any man's character for truth is his power to
produce conviction in the minds of those who know him. This power
Joseph had in an eminent degree. So much is admitted by his accusers.
One of their chief accusations was that his neighbours, during his
Prophetick career, believed on his word alone things hardly believable
at all. Never was an attempt to impeach witnesses less successful than
this, of the witnesses of the Book of Mormon. None of the old Prophets
had better testimonies than Joseph and James.
Note 1: James J. Strang incorporated the entire "Spaulding Story" article into the "Priesthood" section of the 1856 edition of his Book of the Law of the Lord.
It seems logical to assume that while the newspaper article was written
as a stand-alone piece of Mormon apologetics. that Strang intended to
have it placed where it was in his 1856 book (published after his
death).
Note 2: Strang's defense on this particular subject is reminiscent of the "lawyer" style arguments he called forth on Aug. 17, 1848
to refute (?) the charges laid against him in the infamous "phosphorus
illumination" fiasco. Mostly the writer ignores the strongest
eye-witness testimony available for the Spalding authorship claims and
concentrates on ridiculing the conclusions and inevitable
contradictions introduced by secondary reporters. To his credit, Strang
did not know of the strong spatial and chronological ties between
Sidney Rigdon and Solomon Spaulding, in and around Pittsburgh between
1812 and 1816. Nor did he fully understand how Rigdon's occasional
employment in making leather book-bindings would have naturally brought
him into contact with the Patterson brothers (publishers and
book-binders) and their employees and associates. Rigdon acknowledged
knowing the publisher and book-seller Robert Patterson and the
publisher acknowledged knowing Rigdon -- stipulating only that Rigdon
was not directly connected with the publishing business until the
period when Patterson was no longer associated with Lambdin (whom,
despite Strang's opinion, Rigdon never denied knowing). While the
Spalding authorship claims for the origin of the Book of Mormon might
be constructively criticized in a number of ways, attempts to eliminate
the connections between Spalding, Pittsburgh publishers, and Sidney
Rigdon will generally prove to be unproductive.
|