[ 2 ]
[ 3 ]
THE GREAT SECRET
"FOR THERE IS NOTHING COVERED THAT WILL NOT BE REVEALED" (Matt. 10:26)
The title of these writings indicates that there is a question regarding the authorship of the New Testament.
The New Testament, the Church, and Christianity, are said to be the creation of the Calpurnius Piso family,
who were Roman aristocrats. The New Testament and all the characters in it -- Jesus, all the Josephs, all
the Marys, all the disciples, apostles, Paul, and John the Baptist -- all are said to be fictional. It is
believed that the Pisos, a prominent Roman family, created the story and the characters; and tied the story
into a specific time and place in history; and connected it with some peripheral people, such as the Herods,
Gamaliel, the Roman procurators, ect., and Jesus and everyone involved with him were created (that is fictional!)
characters.
The family headed by Lucius Piso were the Calpurnius Pesos, descended from statesmen and consuls, and from
great poets and historians as well. Gaius Lucius Calpurnius Piso, was the leader of the family.
In the middle of the first century of the present era, Rome's aristocracy felt itself confronted with a
growing problem. The Jewish religion was continuing to grow in numbers, adding ever more proselytes. Jews
numbered more than 8,000,000.... Romans feared that Judaism would become the chief religion of the Roman
empire.... The Pisos searched for a solution to the problem. They found it in the Jewish holy books....
The Pisos mocked, but marveled at, the Jewish belief in their holy books. Therefore they felt that a new
"Jewish" book would be the ideal method to pacify the Judeans and strengthen their control of the country.
About the year, 60 A.D., Lucius Calpurnius Piso composed Ur Marcus, the first version of the Gospel of Mark,
which no longer exists. Then Piso wrote, the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. The Jesus figure which Piso
creates is a composite. He plagiarized the Hebrew scriptures. Especially, he loved and borrowed freely from
the prophet Isaiah, whose 44th chapter was most helpful. Piso's idea to make Jesus a god to whom to bow,
worship and pray came from Isaiah 44:17;... and the idea for Jesus' cross came from Isaiah 44:13. Piso
makes Jesus "fulfill" a multitude of verses from the Hebrew Bible.
PISO ALSO CREATED JOSEPHUS' WORKS
In addition to creating Jesus in literature, Piso created for himself another famous literary role, that of
a perported Jewish general and historian: Flavius Josephus. As Josephus, Piso contended he had bravely led his
fellow Jews in the war against the Roman invaders. However, like Jesus, Josephus existed only in literature,
that is, in Piso's own writings. Under his fictional name of Flavius Josephus he wrote during these approximate
years the following:
The Jewish War 75-80 C.E
Jewish Antiquities 90-93 C.E.
His purported autobiography 96-103 C.E.
Contra Apionem 103-105 C.E.
Discourse to the Greeks Concerning Hades c. 105 C.E.
Then Calpurnius Piso wrote the following gospels:
The Gospel of Mark (now lost).
The Gospel According to Saint Matthew.
The Gospel According to Saint Mark.
The Gospel According to Saint Luke.
The writings of Paul.
[ 4 ]
AN EXTRACT
OUT OF
JOSEPHUS' DISCOURSE TO THE GREEKS CONCERNING HADES
1. Now as to Hades, wherein the souls of the righteous and unrighteous are detained, it is necessary to speak of
it. Hades is a place in the world not regularly finished; a subterraneous region where the light of the world does
not shine; from which circumstances, that in this place the light does not shine, it cannot be but there must be
in it perpetual darkness. This region is allowed as a place of custody for souls, in which angels are appointed
as guardians to them, who distribute to them temporary punishments, agreeable to every one's behavior and manners.
2. In this region there is a certain place set apart, as a lake of unquenchable fire, wherein we suppose no
one hath hitherto been cast; but it is prepared for a day afore-determined by God, in which one righteous sentence
shall deservedly be passed upon all men; when the unjust and those that have been disobedient to God, and have
given honor to such idols as have been the vain operations of the hands of men, as to God himself, shall be
adjudged to this everlasting punishment, as having been the causes of defilement; while the just shall obtain
an incorruptible and never-fading kingdom. These are now indeed confined to Hades, but not in the same
place wherein the unjust are confined.
3. For there is one decent into this region, at whose gate we believe who stands an archangel with a host;
which gate when those pass through that are conducted down by the angels appointed over souls, they do not go
the same way; but the just are guided to the right hand and are led with hymns sung by the angels appointed
over that place, unto a region of light, in which the just have dwelt from the beginning of the world; not
constrained by necessity, but ever enjoying the prospect of the good things they see, and rejoice in the
expectation of those new enjoyments which will be peculiar to every one of them, and esteeming those things
beyond what we have here; with them there is no place of toil, no burning heat, no piercing cold, nor are there
any briers there; but the countenance of the fathers and of the just, which they see, always smiles upon them,
while they wait for that rest and eternal new life in heaven, which is to succeed this region. This place we
call The Bosom of Abraham.
4. But as to the unjust, they are dragged by force to the left hand, by the angels allotted for punishment,
no longer going with a good-will, but as prisoners driven by violence; to whom are sent the angels appointed
over them to reproach them and to threaten them with their terrible looks, and to thrust them still downwards.
Now those angels that are set over these souls, drag them into the neighborhood of hell itself; who, when they
are hard by it, continually hear the noise of it, and do not stand clear of the hot vapor itself; but when
they have a nearer view of this spectacle, as of a terrible and exceeding great prospect of fire, they are
struck with a fearful expectation of a future judgment, and in effect punished thereby; and not only so, but
where they see the place [or choir] of the fathers and of the just, even hereby are they punished; for a
chaos deep and large is fixed between them; insomuch that a just man that hath compassion upon them, cannot
be admitted, nor can one that is unjust, if he were bold enough to attempt it, pass over it.
5. This is the discourse concerning Hades, wherein the souls of all men are confined until a proper season,
which God hath determined, when he will make a resurrection of all men from the dead, not procuring a
transmigration of souls from one body to another, but raising again those very bodies, which you Greeks,
seeing to be dissolved, do not believe [their resurrection;] but learn not to disbelieve it; for while you
believe that the soul is created, and yet is made immortal by God, according to the doctrine of Plato, and
this in time, be not incredulous, but believe that God is able, when he hath raised to life that body which
was made as a compound of the same elements, to make it immortal; for it must never be said of God that he is
able to do some things, and unable to do others. We have therefore believed that the body will be raised again;
for although it be dissolved, it is not perished; for the earth receives its remains, and preserves them; and
while they are like seed, and are mixed among the more fruitful soil, they flourish, and what is sown is
indeed sown bare grain; but at the mighty sound of God the Creator, it will sprout up, and be raised in a
clothed and glorious condition, though not before it has been dissolved, and mixed [with the earth] so
that we have not
[ 5 ]
rashly believed the resurrection of the body; for although it be dissolved for a time on account of the original
transgression, it exists still, and is cast into the earth as a potters furnace, in order to be formed again,
but in a state of purity, and so as never to be destroyed any more: and to every body shall its own soul be
restored; and when it hath clothed itself with that body, it will not be subject to misery, but being itself
pure, it will continue with its pure body, and rejoice with it, with which it having walked righteously now in
this world, and never having had it as a snare, it would receive it again with great gladness; but as for the
unjust, they will receive their bodies not changed, not freed from diseases or distempers, nor made glorious,
but with the same diseases wherein they died; and such as they were in their unbelief, the same shall they be
when they shall be faithfully judged.
6. For all men, the just as well as the unjust, shall be brought before God the word; for to him hath the
Father committed all judgment and he, in order to fulfill the will of his Father, shall come as judge,
whom we call Christ. For Minos and Rhadamanthus are not judges, as you Greeks do suppose, but he whom God
even the Father hath glorified, CONCERNING WHOM WE HAVE ELSEWHERE GIVEN A MORE PARTICULAR ACCOUNT, FOR
THE SAKE OF THOSE WHO SEEK AFTER TRUTH. This person, exercising the righteous judgment of the Father towards
all men, hath prepared a just sentence for every one, according to his works; at whose judgment-seat when all men,
and angels, and demons shall stand, they will send forth one voice, and say, JUST IS THY JUDGMENT; the
rejoinder to which will bring a just sentence upon both parties, by giving justly to those that have done well an
everlasting fruition; but allotting to the lovers of wicked works eternal punishment. To these belong
the unquenchable fire, and that without end, and a certain fiery worm never dying, and not destroying
the body, but continuing its eruption out of the body with never-ceasing grief; neither will sleep give ease to these
men, nor will the night afford them comfort; death will not free them from their punishment, nor will the interceding
prayers of their kindred profit them; for the just are no longer seen by them, nor are they thought worthy of remembrance;
but the just shall remember only their righteous actions, whereby they have attained the heavenly kingdom, in
which there is no sleep, no sorrow, no corruption, no care, no night, no day measured by time, no sun driven in his
course along the circle of heaven by necessity, and measuring out the bounds and conversions of the seasons, for the
better illumination of the life of men; no moon decreasing and increasing, or introducing a variety of seasons,
nor will she then moisten the earth; no burning sun, no Bear turning around [the pole] no Orion to rise, no
wandering of innumerable stars. The earth will not then not be difficult to be passed over, nor will it be hard
to find out the court of Paradise, nor will there be any fearful roaring of the sea, forbidding the passengers
to walk on it: even that will be made easily passable to the just, though it will not be void of moisture.
Heaven will not then be uninhabitable by men; and it will not be impossible to discover the way of ascending
thither. The earth will not be uncultivated, nor require too much labor of men, but will bring forth its fruits
of its own accord, and will be well adorned with them. There will be no more generations of wild beasts, nor
will the substance of the rest of the animals shoot out any more; for it will not produce men, but the number
of the righteous will continue, and never fail, together with the righteous angels, and spirits [of God,] and
with his word, as a choir of righteous men and women that never grow old, and continue in an incorruptible state,
singing hymns to God, who hath advanced them to that happiness, by the means of a regular institution of life;
with whom the whole creation also will lift up a perpetual hymn from corruption to incorruption as glorified
by a splendid and pure spirit. It will not then be restrained by a bond of necessity, but with a lively freedom
shall offer up a voluntary hymn, and shall praise him that made them, together with the angels, and spirits,
and men now freed from all bondage.
7. And now, if you Gentiles will be persuaded by these motives, and leave your vain imaginations about your
pedigrees, and gaining of riches and philosophy, and will not spend your time about subtleties of words, and
thereby lead your minds into error, and if you will apply your ears to the hearing to the inspired prophets,
the interpreters, both of God and his word, and will believe in God, you shall be both partakers of these things,
and obtain the good things that are to come; you shall see the ascent into the immense heaven plainly, and that
kingdom which is there; for what God hath now concealed in silence [will be then manifest,] what neither eye
hath seen, nor ear hath heard, nor hath it entered into the heart of man, the things that God hath prepared
for them that love him.
[ 6 ]
8. In whatsoever ways I shall find you, in them shall I judge you entirely; so cries the END of
all things. And he that hath at first lived a virtuous life, but towards the later end falls into vice, these labors
by him before endured, shall be altogether vain and unprofitable, even as in a play, brought to an ill catastrophe.
Whosoever shall have lived wickedly and luxuriously may repent; however, there will be need of much time to
conquer an evil habit, and even after repentance his whole life must be guarded with great care and diligence,
after the manner of a body, which, after it hath been a long time afflicted with a distemper, requires a stricter
diet and method of living; for though it may be possible, perhaps, to break off the chain of our irregular
affections at once, yet our amendment cannot be secured without the grace of God, the prayers of good men, the
help of the brethren, and our own sincere repentance and constant care. It is a good thing not to sin at all;
it is also good, having sinned, to repent, as it is best to have good health always; but it is a good thing to
recover from a distemper. To God be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
These lines will be familiar to the New Testament scholar. It is further evidence that the New Testament was
written by Calpernius Piso alias Flavius Josephus.
With their fathers death in 65, the Pisos vanish from public Roman history. For the next 73 years they are
busy writing the additional books of the New Testament and tightening their power over the known world; but
they appear only by their alias names.
To the researcher, the above account of Piso, alias Josephus, may seem to be spurious. But it is interesting
to know that there is nothing written of Josephus' life, by any of the many historical writers of his day.
If Josephus was a real person and experienced the account said to have been written of himself, surely he
would have merited some place in the history of Rome or Jerusalem. But his works are the only evidence that
he may have actually existed. (The information on these pages was taken from a paper titled "The True Authorship
of the New Testament" by Abela Reuchli [sic - Abelard Reuchlin])
The following account of Josephus' purported life was written in 1878 by W.S. LaSor:
"Josephus, or more accurately Joseph ben Matthias, was born the year Gaius acceded to the throne of the
Roman empire, A.D. 37, and died sometime after A.D. 100. He was born of a priestly family and through
his Hasmonean mother could boast of royal blood... In brief we can divide his life into two parts, each
about thirty-three years in length: the first half could be described as the life of Joseph ben Matthias,
Jewish priest, General, and prisoner; the second half, with some reservations, as the life of Flavius
Josephus the Roman citizen and author....
After the destruction of Jerusalem, Josephus was given a tract of land near Jerusalem, a number of books,
and a chance to retire to a life off quiet contemplation. He chose, to return to Rome with Titus, where he
became a client of the Flavian family, received Roman citizenship, and was commissioned to write a history
of the Jewish people....
Josephus' first literary work was the Wars of the Jews, published in the closing years of the reign of
Vespasian... he composed the work first in Aramaic. According to his own word, he translated it into Greek...
The Wars of the Jews was written under the commission of the emperor, and can be looked upon as a bit of
propaganda, designed to deter others who might have been tempted to revolt.
His Antiquities of the Jews was published about fifteen years later (A.D. 93 or 94)...
His life was written... shortly after the year A.D. 100, principally as an apology for his own life, to
defend himself against charges made by Justus of Tiberias concerning Josephus' conduct during the war in
Galilee.
(His treatise) Against Apion is an apology for Judaism in which Josephus evaluates the ideals of Hellenism
and shows its deficiencies while at the same time showing the excellencies of the Jewish religion."
(FORWARD by William Sanford LaSor, William Wiston, Josephus' Complete Works 1878).
[ 7 ]
The earliest non-Christian reference to a Christ occurs in Piso's Antiquities of the Jews A.D. 93.
Now, there was about this time, Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he
was a doer of wonderful works -- a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure.
He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the gentiles. He was [the] Christ;
and when Pilot, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the
cross, those who Ioved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive
again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other things
concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
(William Whiston, Josephus' Complete Works, 1978 ed., p. 379)
Calpurnius Piso, (alias Josephus) tells of Christ a second time:
Albinus... assembled the sanhedrim of the judges, and brought before them the brother
of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or some of
his companions] and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the
law, he delivered them to be stoned. (ibid. p. 423)
About 110 CE, the Roman historian Tactitus told of Christ and the Christians:
Nero, in order to stifle the rumor, (as if he himself had not set Rome on fire,)
ascribed it to those people who were hated for their wicked practices, and called
by the vulgar, Christians: these he punished exquisitely. The author of this name
was Christ, who, in the reign of Tiberius, was brought to punishment by Pontius
Pilate the procurator. (Whiston, p. 639)
About 147 CE, Justin Martyr wrote: "You Jews knew that Jesus was risen from the dead, and ascended into
heaven, as the prophecies did foretell was to happen. (ibid)
These testamonies were undoubtedly inspired by the earlier written statements by Piso.
Jesus in Rabinical Tradition
There are other references to Jesus in Jewish literature, beyond those found
in the works of Josephus, he is mentioned, expressly or allusively, in a number
of places in the earlier Rabbinical literature.... It is from the Tannaitic period
that we should expect the most reliable traditions about Jesus, if indeed any
traditions about him are to be found at all. The most important is a baraitha
preserved in the Talmudic tractate Sanhedrim (43a) "Jesus was hanged on Passover
eve. Forty days previously the herald had cried, 'He is being led out for stoning,
because he had practiced sorcery and led Israel astray and incised them into
apostasy. Whoever has anything to say in his defense let him come and declare it.'
As nothing was brought forward in his defense he was hanged on Passover eve...."
To this Baraitha are appended some remarks by Ulla, a later Rabbi who flourished
about the end of the third century. Ulla said: 'Would you believe that any defense
would have been so zealously sought for him. He was a deceiver, and the All Merciful
says: you shall not spare him, neither shall you conceal him' (F.F. Bruce, Jesus
and Christian Origins Outside the New Testament pp. 54-57)
The oldest extant copies of the gospels go back only to the third century. The
original compositions were apparently written between A.D. 60 and 120...
Christian writers before 100 quote the Old but never the New Testament. (Durant p. 555)
It is to be noted that these testimonies of Jesus were written, not at the time of Jesus' supposed life,
but many years later, probably taken from Piso's works.
To these may be added statements found in the Encyclopedia Britannica:
Passages about Jesus in the Babylonian Talmud show that the Babylonian Amorian had no conception of the
historical Jesus and of the time when he lived; All they new about him was composed by hearsay. (also)
It is worthy to note that there is no mention of Christianity and its founders in the Palestinian Talmud.
(p. 769)
[ 8 ]
It is the opinion of this writer that Piso created the New Testament story and most of the characters, then
tied them to a specific time and place in history, connecting it with actual people such as the Herods.
(See appendix for name lists)
JOSEPHUS PARALLELS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
Since over one hundred personal names in Josephus' perported writings are also found in the New Testament,
it seems obligatory on the part of the researcher to scan his works for further correspondence in details.
Textual evidence is not found wanting to show that the writer of the New Testament was also the writer of
Josephus' works:
Josephus
At the command of God... Abram
left the land of Chaldea... the
people of Mesopotamia...
(Book 1, v 7, 1)
|
Acts
God appeared to... Abraham when
he was in Mesopotamia and said...
get thee out of thy country
(Acts 7:2, 3)
|
Genesis
Now the Lord said
unto Abram -- get thee
out of thy country...
(Gen. 12:1)
|
The above parallels show that it is only in Josephus (Piso) and Acts that God commands Abraham to flee
Mesopotamia. The book of Genesis tells tells nothing of Mesopotamia. This seems to indicate that both the
Luke account and the Josephus account were written by the same person.
Piso wrote:
"Abraham greatly loved Isaac, as his only begotten" (Antq. I, XIII, I) The writer of Hebrews states:
"Abraham when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only
begotten son." (Hebrews 11:17) "his only begotten," in reference to Isaac, is found only in Josephus and
Hebrews. The term is not found in the Old Testament account. This again seems to indicate that the Hebrews
account was written by Piso.
In Piso's Josephus we read:
"The beauty of the child (Moses) was so remarkable, that it detained the spectators, and made them stay longer
to look at him". And that Moses was "educated with great care." (Antq. II, IX, 6, 7) The writer of Acts has
Steven say that Moses was "exceedingly fair" and "was learned in all wisdom of the Egyptians." The Old Testament
account tells nothing of Moses' body nor his education. This again indicates that the New Testament account
was written by Piso.
THEUDAS AND JUDAS OF GALILEE
Piso writes:
Now it came to pass,... that a certain magician whose name was Theudas persuaded a
great part of the people to take their effects with them, and to follow him to the
River Jordan, for he told them he was a prophet.... and many were deluded by his
words. However, Fadus... sent a troop of horsemen out against them; who falling
upon them unexpectedly, slew many of them.... They also took Theudas alive, and
cut off his head, and carried it to Jerusalem....
Then came Tiberius Alexander as successor to Fadus.... and besides this, the sons
of Judas of Galilee were now slain; I mean of that Judas who caused the people to
revolt, when Cyrenius came to take an account of the estates of the Jews" (To
determine their taxation) (Antq. XX V. 1,2)
The New Testament author writes:
For before these days rose up Theudas, boasting himself to be somebody; to whom a
number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves, who was slain; and all, as
many as obeyed him were scattered, and brought to naught.
[ 9 ]
After this man rose up Judas of Galilee in the days of taxing, and drew away much
people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as obeyed him, were
dispersed. (Acts 5:36, 37)
FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD
Piso records that:
Accordingly it appears to me, that the misfortunes, of all men, from the beginning of
the world, if they be compared with the Jews, are not so considerable as they were....
For example I shall relate how Antiochus, who was named Epiphanes, took Jerusalem by
force and held it three years and three months.... Accordingly Matthias... together
with his own family... fled to the Mountains... and... many of the people followed
him. (Wars preface v. 4,7)
This Antiochus Epiphanes, and his taking of Jerusalem by force, was described by Piso as the abomination
of desolation "which came to pass according to the prophecy of Daniel." (Antq. XII, VII, 6)
In the New Testament, the writer of Matthew tells a similar account, but applies the event to some time in
the future:
When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet,
stand in the holy place. Then let them which be in Judae flee to the mountains.... For
then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this
time, no nor ever shall be." (Matt. 24:15, 21)
The similarity of these verses from Piso and Matthew again seem to indicate the connection between the two.
ZOROBABLE SON OF SALATHIEL
The old Testament book of 1st Chronicles lists the genealogy of the descendants of David. Chapter three,
verses 17 and 18 lists Jeconiah as the father of Salathiel, and Zorubbable as the son of Pedaiah and nephew
of Salathiel. Josephus (Piso) also gives the genealogy of David, but differs from the Bible, telling that
Zorobable was the son of Salathiel, leaving Pedaiah out of the genealogical line. Piso (Josephus) renders
the spelling of Zorobable differently from the Zorubbable of the Bible (Antq. XI, III, 10).
The writers of Matthew I:12 and Luke 3:27 also list the Davidic genealogy but both follow the line given in
Josephus, leaving Pedaiah out of David's line. Matthew and Luke follow the Piso-Josephus account again when
they spell the name "Zorobable" while the Bible uses the Zorubbable spelling.
THE TWELVE AND SEVENTY
Josephus reads:
He (Varus) therefore called twelve of the Jews of Caesarea, of the best character and
ordered them to go to Ecbatana.... He also enjoined them to send seventy of their
principal men.... so these seventy went down to Caesarea, together with the Twelve..."
(Jos. Life, sec. 11)
Piso' New Testament also tells of the twelve and seventy:
Then he called his twelve disciples together... and sent them to preach the Kingdom of
God... After these things the lord appointed other seventy a two and two and sent them
two and two before his face into every city and place. (Luke 9:1, 10:1)
THE TEMPLE OF DIANA
Piso tells us that:
...when Judas heard that Timotheus prepared himself to flight, he took all his own army
and went in haste against Timotheus... About this time it was that King Antiochus, as
he was going over the upper countries, heard that there was... a very rich Temple of
Diana, and that it was full of all sorts of donations.., left there by Alexander...
king of Macedonia..." (Antq. XII, VIII, 4, XII, IX, I)
[ 10 ]
The writer of Acts also mentions "Timotheus" "Alexander" and "Macedonia" in connection with the "Temple
of Diana" story:
So he sent to Macedonia, two of them that ministered unto him, Timotheus and Erastus....
moreover... this Paul hath persuaded and turned away much people, saying that they be
no Gods.... also that the Temple of the great goddess Diana should be despised....
and they drew Alexander out of the multitude. (Acts 19:22, 27)
TRIAL OF THE SANHEDRIM
Piso tells of Herod's trial before the Sanhedrim:
...for those women continued every day in the temple, persuading the king and the
people that Herod might undergo a trial before the Sanhedrim for what he had done.
Hycranus was so moved by these complaints, that he summoned Herod to come to his
trial for what was charged upon him... when Herod stood before the Sanhedrim,...
he affrighted them all, and no one of his Accusers durst, after that, to bring
any charge against him, but there was a deep silence, and nobody knew what was
to be done.
When affairs stood thus, one whose name was Simeon, a righteous man he was...
rose up and said, 'O you that are accusers with me... I neither have ever myself
known such a case... that one who is called to take his trial by us ever stood
in such a manner before us... but this admirable man Herod, (who is called King
of the Jews) is called to answer so heavy an accusation, stands here in purple...
yet do I not make this complaint against Herod...
But when Hycranus saw that members of the Sanhedrim were ready to pronounce the
sentence of death upon Herod, he put off the trial to another day... for that his
accusation, which was derived from evil councilors, and not from... (Antq. XIV, IX, 4).
The New Testament tells of Jesus' trial before the Sanhedrim:
And the chief priests and the council (the Sanhedrim) sought witness against Jesus
to put him to death; and found none... and there arose certain, and bare false
witness... And the high priest stood up in their midst and asked Jesus, saying:
Answerest thou nothing? What is it which these witness against thee? But he held
his peace and answered him nothing.... And the chief priests.., delivered him to
Pilate, and Pilate asked him, Art thou King of the Jews? And he answering said to
him, Thou sayest it. And the chief priests accused him of many things: but he
answered him nothing (And Herod said: I am innocent of the blood of this just
person (Matt. 27:24)
And the soldiers led him away... and they clothed him in purple.... and began to
salute him. 'hail king of the Jews'.... and they compel one Simon.... to bear his
cross. (Mark 15:17-21).
FALSE PROPHET ON THE MOUNT OF OLIVES
Piso tells of a false prophet:
...now these impostors and deceivers persuaded the multitude to follow them into the
wilderness, and pretended that they would exhibit manifest wonders and signs, that
should be performed by the providence of God.... Moreover, there came out of Egypt
about this time to Jerusalem, one that said he was a prophet, and advised the multitude...
to go along with him to the Mount of Olives, as it was called, which lay over against
the city.... He said further that he would shew them, how, at his command the walls
of Jerusalem would fall down. (Antq. XX, VIII, 6)
[ 11 ]
The writer of Mark tells a similar story:
And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him, Master see what
manner of stones and what buildings are here! And Jesus answering said to him, see thou
these great buildings? There shall not be left one stone that shall not be throne down.
And as he sat upon the Mount of Olives over against the temple, Peter and James and John
and Andrew ask him privately, tell us when shall there things be.... And Jesus answering
them began to say: Take heed lest any man deceive you: for many will come in my name
saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.... For false Christ's and false prophets
shall rise and show signs and wonders, to seduce if it were possible, even the elect.
(Mark 13:1-6, 22)
In this parallel the Egyptian false prophet in Piso becomes the prophet Christ of the New Testament. It is seen
that in both accounts the prophets were deceivers who led their followers into the wilderness. In Piso the false
prophet would manifest "wonders and signs," while in Mark the-prophet reversed the saying and would "show signs
and wonders." In both stories the prophets prophesied that they would destroy the walls or buildings of the
temple.
The writer of Acts has the chief captain ask Paul: "Art thou not that Egyptian which before these days madest
an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers." Acts 21:38)
SUNDRY LAWS
Piso:
These Essenes reject pleasures as as evil, but esteem continence (self restraint), and the
conquest over our passions, to be virtue. They neglect wedlock, but... do not absolutely
deny the fitness of marriage, and the succession of mankind thereby continued; but they
guard against the lascivious behavior of women, and are persuaded that none of them preserve
their fidelity to one man. (Wars II, VIII, 2)
New Testament:
Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: it is good for a man not to touch a woman.
Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have
her own husband.... For I would that all men were even as myself. (celibate)... I say therefore
to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I. But if they cannot
contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. (1st Cor. 7:1-9)
Piso:
These men are despisers of riches.... Nor is there any one to be found among them who hath
more than another, for it is a law among them, that those who come to them must let what
they have to be common to the whole order, insomuch that among them all there is no appearance
of poverty or excess of riches, but every one's Possessions are intermingled with every other's
Possessions; and so there is, as it were, one patrimony among all the brethren.... To provide
succor... when they stand in need of it. (Wars II, VIII, 3,6)
New Testament:
And all that believed were together, and had all things in common, and sold their Possessions
and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
Piso:
They are eminent for fidelity, and are ministers of peace; whatsoever they say also is firmer
that an oath; but swearing is avoided by them, and they esteem it worse than perjury; for
they say, that he that cannot be believed without swearing by God, is already condemned.
(Wars II, VIII, 6)
New Testament:
But above all things, my brethren, Swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither
by any other oath: but let your yea be yea, and tour nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.
(James 5:12).
[ 12 ]
It is apparent that the author of Luke/Acts used a format taken from the works of Piso (Josephus):
LUKE-ACTS
"It seems good to me... to write to thee
in order, most excellent Theophilus
that thou might know the certainty of
these things" (Luke 1:3)
"The former treatise have I made O
Theophilus, of all that Jesus began
both to do and to teach..." (Acts I: I)
JOSEPHUS
"I suppose, that by my books of the
Antiquities of the Jews, most excellent
Epaphroditus. I have made it evident to
those that pursue them that our nation
is of great antiquity."
(Against Apion Book 1, v. 1)
"In The former book, most honorable
Epaphroditus, I have demonstrated our
Antiquity, and confirming the truth of
what I have said." (Ibid book 2, v, 1)
PISO AGAIN ASSUMES THE ROLE OF JOSEPHUS
There are also some similarities between events in Josephus' alleged life and that told of Paul (Saul) of the
New Testament. Both Josephus and Paul, in the early years of their lives, subscribed to the sect of the Pharisees.
Paul changed his name from the Jewish "Saul" to the Roman Paul (Paulus). Josephus changed his name from the
Jewish "Joseph ben Matthias" to the Roman "Josephus." Paul was a Roman soldier before being converted to
Christianity and Josephus was said to be a priest before becoming a Jewish army commander. Both Josephus and
Paul were said to have made a similar disastrous sea voyage to Rome, in the same 62-64 CE time period, as a
result of an interview with Felix, the Roman governor of Caesarea. Both were writers while residing in Rome,
both changed their allegiance to their governments; Paul, from the Romans to the Christian Jews, and Josephus
from his Jewish background to Roman citizenship, and both Paul and Josephus were apparently about the same age.
The pastoral letters of the New Testament are said to be, by most biblical scholars, the earliest written of
the New Testament documents, mainly because they make no reference to, or use any material from, the Synoptic
Gospels. It is logical to assume then, that the Epistle to the Romans may have been the earliest written of
the pastoral letters as it was addressed to the [supposed] new Jewish/ Christian Church at Rome. But the real
purpose of the epistle, may not have been to lend support to the fledgling church at Rome, but to establish
a fictitious remote date for the formation of the Christian Church, and, by interpolating from Old Testament
literature as many as two-hundred sayings, to convince the pious Jews that the "New Gospel" was the same as
the old.
A second purpose in writing the epistle to the Romans may have been to create scripture which would appeal to
Jewish thinking. Passages such as:
But glory, honor, peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jews first,
and also to the Gentile; for there is no respect of persons with God (Romans 2:11).
Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the
Gentiles also. (Romans, 3:29).
In the first verse of this epistle, the Piso is careful not to offend the Jews. He begins by telling his readers
that his gospel is "The gospel of God, which he had promised afore by his prophets in the Holy Scriptures."
He is quick to mention that Jesus "was made of the seed of David according to the flesh...and declared to be
the Son of God...by the resurrection of the dead."
[ 13 ]
THE VOYAGE TO ROME
In the opening pages of "The Life of Flavius Josephus" Piso tells how Josephus "made a trial of the several
sects that were among us" and "began to conduct myself according to the rules of the Pharisees". Josephus
(Piso) goes on to say:
When I was in the twenty-sixth year of my age it happened that I took a voyage to Rome;
and this on the occasion which I shall now describe. At the time that Felix was procurator
of Judea, there were certain Priests of my acquaintance, and very excellent persons they
were whom on a small and trifling occasion he had put into bonds and sent to Rome to
plead their cause before Caesar. Accordingly I came to Rome, though it were through a
great number of hazards, by sea; for, as our ship was drowned in the Adriatic Sea, we that
were in it, being about six hundred in number, swam for our lives all that night; when,
on the first appearance of day, and upon our sight of a ship of Cyrene, I and some others,
eighty in all, by Gods providence were taken up into the other ship... (Life p. 2 v.3)
The writer of the New Testament book; The Acts of the Apostles tells a strikingly similar story about Paul the
apostle. Paul, like Josephus, informs us that he was a "Pharisee." (Acts 23:6) Paul, like Josephus, is brought
in bonds (Acts 25:14) before Felix to be judged. (Acts 24:22) Paul, like the prisoners in the Josephus story,
is taken to Rome to be tried before Caesar, according to Roman law. (Acts 25:10) Paul and "certain other
prisoners" as in Josephus were taken aboard a ship, set sail, and:
...not long after there arose... a tempestuous wind... and when the ship was caught,
and could not bear up to the wind, we let her drive.... But when the fourteenth night
was come, as we were driven up and down in Adria (Adriatic) about midnight the
shipman deemed that they drew near some country....
And we were in all in the ship two hundred threescore and sixteen souls. And when it
was day... those who could swim... escaped all safe to land. And after three months we
departed in (another) ship.... and thence to Rome.
The writer of Josephus says nothing of the trial of Josephus' priests before Caesar and abruptly ends his story
with comments about an actor of plays named Aliturius.
The New Testament writer, as if he were following the text he had previously written, also says nothing further
on this most important part of his story, i.e. the trial of Paul before Caesar. The writer lapses into a
dialogue on Paul's missionary work among the Romans.
SAUL
Piso/Josephus:
Saul together with Philip... ran away from the city... (Jerusalem)... in the
meantime the people of Damascus, when they were informed of the destruction of the Romans set
about the slaughter of those Jews that were among them... but as to those (including Saul)....
got together in great numbers... and appointed a great many generals for the war....
Jesus the son of Sapphias, one of the high priests; and Eleazar, son of Ananias, the
high priest... Joseph the son of Simon was sent as a general to Jericho... and John
the Essene, to the toparchy of Thamma." (Wars II, XX, 1-4)
New Testament:
And Saul was consenting to (Steven's) death and at that time there was a great persecution...
at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea.... As
for Saul, he made havoc of the church... Then Philip went down to the city... And there
was a certain man called Simon... and Saul... went unto the High Priest and desired
of him letters to Damascus... And there was a certain disciple at Damascus named Ananias...
(Acts 8:1-14, 9:1-10)
[ 14 ]
PARABLES
Piso/Josephus:
Now the sagacity and wisdom which God had bestowed upon Solomon was so great... for he spake
a parable upon every sort of tree, from the hyssop to the cedar, and in like manner about
beasts, about all sorts of living creatures, whether upon the earth, or in the seas, or in
the air: for he was not unacquainted with any of their natures, nor omitted inquiries about
them, and described them all like a philosopher. (Antq. VIII, 11, 5)
New Testament:
And he spake many things unto them in parables, saying.... All these things spake Jesus
unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not to them. (Matt. 13:3, 34)
CASTING OUT DEMONS
Piso/Josephus:
After telling about King Solomon teaching in parables, Piso tells of Solomon's other talents:
God also enabled (Solomon) to learn that skill which expels demons, which is a science
useful and sanitive to men. He composed such incantations also by which distempers are
alleviated. And he left behind him the manner of using exorcisms. by which they drive
away demons, so that they never return, and this method of cure is of great force unto
this day; for I have seen a man of my own country whose name was Eleasar, releasing people
that were demonical.... The manner of the cure was this: He put a ring that had a root
of one of those sorts mentioned by Solomon to the nostrils of the demonic, after which
he drew out the demon through his nostrils; and when the man fell down immediately, he
adjured the demon to return into him no more. (Antq. VIII, II, 5)
It is interesting that Matthew, in the chapter just preceding his recitation of Christs parables, tells of one
"possessed with a devil" and casts him out. (Matt. 12:22) Mark and Luke also give their rendition of
the same event. Both Piso/Josephus and Mark tell of healing of the sick in connection with casting out devils
JOHN THE BAPTIST
Piso/Josephus:
Herod the tetrarch had married the daughter of Aretas (the King of Arabia)... however,
he fell in love with Herodius... (his brother Philip's wife) This man ventured to
talk to her about a marriage between them... one article of this marriage was this,
that he should divorce Aretas's daughter.... who soon came to her father, and told him
of Herod's intentions. So Aretas made this the first occasion of his enmity between
him and Herod, who had also some quarrel with him about the limits of the country of
Gamalitis. So they raised armies on both sides and prepared for war.... And when
they had joined in battle, all of Herod's army was destroyed... now some of the Jews
thought that the destruction of Herod's army came from God... as a punishment for what
he did to John, that was called the Baptist; for he slew him. who was a good man, and
commanded the Jews to exercise virtue... and... to come to baptism... not in order
to the putting away some sins only, but for the purification of the body... Now when
many others came to crowd about him, for they were greatly moved by hearing his words.
Herod who feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put it into
his power and inclination to raise a rebellion, thought it best, by putting him to
death, to prevent any mischief he might cause... Accordingly he was sent a prisoner,
out of Herod's suspicious temper, to Macherus... and was there put to death.
(Antiq. XVIII, V, 2)
The writer of Mark gives a shorter and somewhat different version of the story:
And King Herod heard of [Jesus] (for his name was spread abroad) and he said, that
John the Baptist was risen from the dead, and therefore mighty works do show forth
[ 15 ]
themselves in him.... For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, and
bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, his brother Philip's wife; for he had married
her. For John had said unto Herod, it is not lawful for thee to have thy brother's
wife. Therefore Herod had a quarrel against him, and would have killed him; but she
could not: For Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man and an holy... and
heard him gladly....
And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in and danced, and pleased Herod and
them that sat with him, the king said to the damsel: Ask of me what thou wilt, and
I will give it thee.... and she came in straightway with haste unto the king and asked,
saying, I will that thou give me by and by in a charger the head of John the Baptist...
And immediately the king sent an executioner, and commanded his head to be brought:
and he went and beheaded him in prison... (Mark 6:14-28)
BIRTH OF A GOD
This day has given the earth an entirely new aspect. The world would have gone to
destruction had there not streamed forth from him, who is now born, a common blessing.
Rightly does he judge who recognizes in this birth-day the beginning of life and all
the powers of life; now is that time ended when men pitied themselves for being born.
From no other day does the individual or the community receive such benefit as from
this natal day, full of blessings to all.
The providence which rules over all has filled this man with such gifts for the salvation
of the world, as designate him as savior, for us and coming generations; of wars he will
make an end, and establish all things worthily.
By his appearing are the hopes of our forefathers fulfilled; not only has he surpassed
the good deeds of earlier time, but it is impossible that one greater than he can never
appear.
The birthday of God has brought to the world glad tidings that are bound up in him From
this birth day a new era begins.
So runs the most perfect of a number of inscriptions lately found in Asia Minor and set
up to commemorate the introduction of the Julian calendar by the Emperor Agustus. It
bears a date corresponding to our B.C. 9.
G.S.R. Mead, Fragments of a Faith Forgotten 1960, p. 4)
The author of Acts also tells of Agustus and the birth of a god:
And it came to pass in those days, there went up a decree from Caesar Augustus that all
the world should be taxed... and Joseph also went up from Galilee... to be taxed with
Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.... and she brought forth her first born
son... And., lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them... and the angel of the Lord said
unto them, fear not: for, behold, I bring good tidings of great joy, which shall be to
all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a savior, which is Christ the Lord...
And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God
and saying, glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.
(Luke 2:1-14)
It is interesting that the birth of the Roman god Augustus, and the birth of the Christ Child would both set
into action the beginning of a new calendar system, and this only five years apart. Once again it is seen that
the writers of the New Testament borrowed from Roman history.
[ 16 ]
The pastoral letters of the New Testament are said to be, by most biblical scholars, the earliest written of the
New Testament documents, mainly because they make no reference to, or use any material from, the Synoptic Gospels.
It is logical to assume then, that the Epistle to the Romans may have been the earliest written of the pastoral
letters as it was addressed to the [supposed] new Jewish/Christian Church at Rome. But the real purpose of the
epistle, may not have been to lend support to the fledgling church at Rome, but to establish a fictitious remote
date for the formation of the Christian Church, and, by interpolating from Old Testament literature as many as
two-hundred sayings, to convince the pious Jews that the "new Gospel" was the same as the old.
A second purpose in writing the epistle to the Romans may have been to create scripture which would appeal to
Jewish thinking. Passages such as:
But glory, honor, peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jews first,
and also to the Gentile; for there is no respect of persons with God (Romans 2:11).
Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the
Gentiles also (Romans, 3:29).
In the first verse of the epistle, Piso is careful not to offend the Jews. He begins by telling his readers that
his gospel is "The gospel of God, which he had promised afore by his prophets in the Holy Scriptures."
Piso is quick to mention that Jesus "was made of the seed of David according to the flesh...and declared to be
the Son of God...by the resurrection of the dead."
THE MANY FACES OF JESUS
Piso/Josephus tells of over a dozen high priests whose names were "Jesus." The name Jesus means "Son of Salvation."
Technically speaking, any one of the Jesus's mentioned by Piso could have been called "the anointed one" or
"Saviour," in fact the appellation "Saviour" was given by Piso to several other persons:
King Artaxerxes called Mordecai, "my benefactor, and my Saviour" at Antq. XI, VI, 12.
Ptolemy Epiphanes, King of Egypt, was called "my saviour" at Antq, XII, I, I.
Antiochus Epiphanes, (God manifest) was called "my saviour" at Antq. XII, V, 5.
King Herod was called "saviour" at Antq. XIV, XV, 8.
And Caesar was called "saviour" at Antq. XVI, IV, 3.
Jesus Son of Ananus:
Piso/Josephus tells us that "Jesus son of Ananus" became despondent over the sinful actions of the Jews at
Jerusalem. Jesus came to the temple and cried "in the most lamentable tone possible":
...woe, woe to Jerusalem... he every day uttered these lamentable words as if
it were premeditated, woe, woe, woe to Jerusalem! a melancholy presage of what
was to come.... Woe, woe unto the city again and to the people and to the holy
house! (Wars VI, V, 3)
The writer of Matthew has Jesus of Nazareth also go the temple at Jerusalem and chastise the Scribes and Pharisees
in the same lamentable way:
But woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of
heaven against man... Woe unto you... hypocrites! for ye devour widow's houses...
Woe unto you... for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte... Woe unto you
blind guides, which say, whosoever shall swear by the temple it is nothing...
Woe unto you... hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have
omitted the weightier matters of the law... Woe unto you... for ye are like whited
sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead
men's bones... O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that
[ 17 ]
killeth the prophets, and stoneth them that are sent unto thee... behold your house
is left unto you desolate. (Matt. 23:13-27)
The Twelve Year Old Jesus
Piso/Josephus tells of the childhood of Josiah, (another name for Jesus) which is much like the Jesus of the
New Testament:
Josiah... was of a most excellent disposition, and naturally virtuous.., and when he
was twelve years old, he gave demonstrations of his religious and righteous behavior,
for he brought the people to a sober way of living... he prudently corrected what
they did wrong, like a very elderly man, and like one abundantly able to understand
what was fit to be done... thus he acted in following the wisdom and sagacity of his
own nature, and in compliance with the advice and instruction of his elders... he
also offered his accustomed sacrifices and burnt offerings upon the altar. He... called
for Eliakim, the high priest, and for the scribes... and sent them to Huldah the
Prophetess, the wife of Shallum and bade them go to her and say that he desired that
she would appease God.
The prophet Jadon... foretold what would come to pass -- viz, that a certain man of
the house of David, Josiah (Jesus) by name, should do what is here mentioned....
And... he called the people to Jerusalem, and there celebrated the feast of the
Passover. (Antq. X, IV, 1-5)
The New Testament tells us that:
Joseph went up... to the city of David... because he was of the house and lineage of
David.... Mary being great with child... brought forth her first born son... (and)
his name was called Jesus... and they brought him to Jerusalem...to offer a sacrifice
according to that which is said in the law (of Moses).... and there was one Anna, a
prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel.... and she coming in that instant gave thanks
likewise unto the Lord... and when they had performed all things according to the
law of the Lord they returned to Galilee... now his parents went to Jerusalem every
year at the feast of the Passover. And when he was twelve years old, they went up to
Jerusalem.... and after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst
of the doctors. (of the law) both hearing them. and asking them questions. And all
that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers... And (Jesus)
increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man. (Luke 2:4-52)
The parallels between the BCE childhood story, of Josiah, (Jesus) in Piso's writings, and the childhood story
of Jesus of the New Testament are striking. Both say the child was "twelve years old", both say he was known
for his wisdom, in both, the accustomed sacrifices were made, both accounts tell of a prophetess who prays to
God (presumably on behalf of the child) and both accounts mention the "Feast of the Passover." The Josephus
account tells that Josiah acted in compliance with the advice and instruction of the elders. The Lukean
account has Jesus "sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions. And both
accounts tell that the child was of the house of David. But Piso could not establish a genuine genealogy for
Christ. (see below)
Jesus of Nazereth?
Matthew tells us that Joseph, Mary and the new born child "came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it
might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets: 'he shall be called a Nazerine'" (Matt. 2:23) The scripture
Matthew is referring to is found in Judges 12: 23, but refers to Manoah and his wife: "For, low, thou shalt
conceive, and bare a son: and no razor shall come on his head: for the child shall be a Nazerite unto God
from the womb... to the day of his death."
The Scripture tells what the child's name would be: not Jesus, not Christ, but Sampson. There is no city in
the Old Testament nor in Josephus's works that bears the name Nazereth.
[ 18 ]
Jason/Jesus
The most interesting, and the most revealing, of the Jesus stories in the writings of Piso is the story of the
Jesus who changed his name to Jason. Piso gives this revealing account:
But when he (the King of Syria) was dead, his brother Antiochus, who was called
Epiphanes (God manifest) took the kingdom.... About this time, upon the death of
Onias the high priest, (of the temple at Jerusalem) they gave the high priesthood
to Jesus (son of salvation) his brother... but this Jesus... was deprived of the
priesthood (after three years) by the king, who was angry with him, and gave it
to his younger brother who was Onias... This Jesus changed his name to Jason: but
Onias was called Menalaus Now the former high priest Jesus raised a sedition
against Menalaus, who was ordained after him, the multitude were divided between
them both. And the sons of Tobias took the part of Menalaus, but the greater part
of the people assisted Jason. (Antq. XII, V, I)
The scene was Palestine ca. 175 BCE. The Selucid empire, which included the Holy Land, with its capital in
Antioch, was ruled by king Antiochus Epihanes IV (god manifest) whom the Greeks called "The God." The Selucid
empire, for the most part, had been hellenized by its Macedonian rulers. The exception being the city of
Jerusalem with its pious Jews whom Antiochus sought to bring over to the Greek way of living. The high priests
of the Jerusalem temple reigned over their peoples only with the permission of king Antiochus who extracted
taxes from the temple treasuries. Jesus, called Jason, a direct descendant of King David, had usurped the high
priest office from his brother Onias, by offering king Antiochus more in tax revenue.
Immediately on taking office, Jesus/Jason the high priest, no doubt at the urging of his god Antiochus,
attempted to bring his fellow Jews over to the more relaxed and enjoyable Greek way of life. By overthrowing
the overbearing laws of Moses taught in the "Law and the Prophets," such as circumcision and the Sabbath day
restrictions, Jesus/Jason hoped to bring the Jews in Jerusalem into the Hellenistic world.
Jesus/Jason's fellow priests, eager for freedom from their rigorous sacrificial ceremonies, neglected their work,
made light of their temple duties and engaged in entertainment in the new-built Greek gymnasium.
Jesus/Jason reigned as high priest of the Jerusalem temple for a period of three years. But the more pious
brethren refused to submit to the Hellenization process, fearing that God would punish them for this sin. This
caused a schism to develop among the Jews. Some were eager for change while others were afraid to depart from
the religious practices of their forefathers. Jesus/Jason made suspicious enemies as well as devout followers.
After a troublesome three year reign, Jesus/Jason was deposed by his wicked brother Menalause who had offered
king Antiochus even more revenue from taxes.
Thus, Jesus/Jason, who had the full support of his god Antiochus, and who had usurped his brothers office,
saw his own usurped by another and was forced to flee to the Amanities (modern Amman Jordan) where he officiated
for a time in a schismatic temple. In the meantime a false report came to the exiled Jesus that king Antiochus
had been killed in Egypt. Seizing what he thought to be an opportunity to regain his former position as high
priest of the Jerusalem temple, Jesus/Jason raised an army and attempted a coup. But Jesus' enemies repulsed
his attack and forced him to flee back across the Jordan to his sanctuary in Arabia.
A grave situation faced Jesus in the Amanitis. Antis, the Arabian king, out of respect to king Antiochus,
arrested Jesus as a fugitive and brought him to trial. Jesus was eventually released or escaped and fled into
Egypt where he lived out the remainder of his life as a political fugitive.
This abridged account of Jesus, who changed his name to Jason, was taken from 1st and 2nd Maccabees and told in
part by Piso in his Antiquities of the Jews XII, V. I.
If this Jesus was the model for the New Testament Jesus, it would explain several statements said to
[ 19 ]
have been made by the Nazerene. It seems inconsistent to have the peace-loving New Testament Jesus say:
Think not that I have come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but the
sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against
her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a mans foes shall
be of his own household. (Matt. 10:34-36)
But this statement would fit very well the militant Jesus who was attempting a coup in Jerusalem to regain
his former position as high priest of the temple. It seems strange that the obscure Nazerene of the New Testament
would have the authority to enter the Jerusalem temple and "cast out them that sold and bought in the temple,
and overthrow the tables of the money changers, and the seats of those who sold doves." But he might do so if
he were the new high priest of the temple, and was in the process of changing the old Jewish temple rites into
the new Greek form of temple worship. Jesus/Jason could not put new wine into old bottles, nor a piece of new
garment upon an old.
The author of Mark tells us that "They were astonished at his doctrine for he taught them as one having authority."
The pious Jews were certainly astonished when Jesus/Jason began teaching them the Greek way of life. The Nazarine
said: "My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me." Jesus/Jason did not attempt to Hellenize the Jews on his
own authority, but under the direction of king Antiochus Epiphanes, his god. When the writer of Acts has the
witnesses say of Steven: "This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place, and the law:
for we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs
which Moses delivered us." they are describing perfectly the mission of the Jesus of ca. 159 B.C.E.. And when
the writers of the synoptic gospels told the people that the kingdom of God would come with power, they were not
telling of the meek teacher of the New Testament, but the Jesus/Jason of ca. 159 B.C.E.
Jesus/Jason, as he fled from Jerusalem after he was deposed as high priest of the Jerusalem temple, might well
have said:
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killeth the prophets, and stoneth them that are
sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen
doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not. Behold your house is
left unto you desolate (The Abomination of Desolation.,of 159 B.C.E.) and verily
I say unto you, ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say:
blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. (Luke 13:34, 35)
Note that the names; Joseph, Jesus, John, Judas, Mattathias, Simon and Philip are found in book twelve of Piso's
Antiquities, following the Jason/Jesus story. These same names were used by Matthew in his story of Jesus of
Nazereth.
DATING THE MESSIAH
The book of St. John tells that the Messias was "the Christ" of New Testament times. But we must turn to the
Old Testament book of Daniel for the correct dating of the Messiah. The angel Gabriel appeared to Daniel and
said:
O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding....
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the
commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem (by King Cyrus ca,
593 B.C.E.), unto Messiah the prince, shall be seven weeks and
three score and two weeks (of years. see Numbers 14:34 and
Ezekiel 4:6).... and after three score and two weeks (434 years)
shall Messiah be cut off... and the people of the prince that shall
come, shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.... and he shall
cause the sacrifices and the oblations to cease, and the spreading
of abominations he shall make it desolate... (Daniel 9:22-27)
[ 20 ]
It seems incredible that the angel Gabriel would say that the people of the Messiah would be responsible for
the destruction of the city of Jerusalem and the temple, and the bringing about of the "abomination of
Desolation". This would be unbecoming of the New Testament Jesus or his people. But these events fit the
historical Jesus/Jason perfectly.
To date the Messiah of the book of Daniel we need only subtract the "three score and two weeks" (434 yrs) when
the Messiah was to be cut off, from the ca. 593 B.C.E. date when Cyrus was commanded by God to rebuild the
Jerusalem temple. The answer is; the Messiah of Daniel's vision would live ca. 159 B.C.E., at the very time of
the historical Jesus/Jason.
Piso at Antq. XII, VII, 6, as well as that told by Bible commentators, tell that the Abomination of Desolation,
i.e. the placing of pagan idols and improper sacrifices on the alter of the Jewish temple, spoken of by Daniel,
took place immediately after the three years Jesus/Jason was high priest of the Jerusalem temple.
When the abomination of Desolation, which had already taken place in ca. 175 B.C.E., is spoken of by the writers
of Matthew (24:15) and by Mark (13:14) as if it were coming in their day, they are placing the events if
Jesus/Jason's life in the time period of Jesus of Nazereth, which implies that the two Jesus' were the same person.
Actually, Piso used the story of Jesus/Jason when he wrote his Jesus of Nazereth story.
Piso confirms this date when he tells that: "This abomination (of desolation) came to pass according to the
prophecy of Daniel, which was given four hundred and eight years before (Antq. XII, VIII, 6) The Piso date is
quite accurate. The time that expired between the commandment to King Cyrus, and the Gabriel revelation, would
account for the small difference between the Daniel account and that of Piso.
The ca. 159 B.C.E,. date for the reign of the Messiah is confirmed a third time when Daniel interprets the
dream of King Nebuchadnezzar. Daniel tells of four successive kingdoms which would rule on the earth. At the
end of the forth kingdom:
shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom (with the Messiah as king) which shall
never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to another people... and
it shall stand forever. (Daniel 2:44)
The first of the four kingdoms, spoken of by Daniel, was that of King Nebuchadnezzar, which was represented by
the head of gold on a great image. The second kingdom was that of King Darius the Mede, represented by arms
of silver. The third kingdom was that of King Cyrus of Persia, represented by a belly and thighs of brass. The
forth kingdom was that of King Alexander, the Macadamian, represented by legs of iron; and feet, part of iron
and part of clay.
Alexander's empire continued after his death under the leadership of Selucid, one of Alexander's generals,
whose descendants continued to rule until Antiochus IV was defeated by Judas Maccabees. This ended the rule
of Daniel's fourth kingdom.
It was towards the end of the reign of King Antiochus IV ca. 175 B.C.E. that the "God of heaven" would set up
his kingdom with the messiah as its king. This again points to our Jesus/Jason.
Piso understood well the writings of the book of Daniel and what was meant by the rule of the four kings:
...there should arise a certain king that should overcome our nation and their
laws and should take away our political government and should spoil the temple,
and forbid the sacrifices to be offered for three years time. And indeed it so
came to pass, that our whole nation suffered these things under Antiochus
Epiphanes, according to Daniel's vision... (Antq. X, XI, VII)
The 159 B.C.E. date for the reign of the Messiah is confirmed a forth time when Daniel tells us that he "saw in
the night visions, and behold, one like the Son of Man come with the clouds of heaven... and there was given
him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom... His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away,
and his kingdom... shall not be destroyed." (Daniel 7:13, 14)
It is clear that Daniel is still telling of the ca. 159 B.C.E. Messiah
[ 21 ]
Piso once more erroneously applies the time period of the Son of Man to his own time for he writes:
For as the lightning cometh out of the East, and shineth unto the west, so shall
the coming of the son of man be.... And they shall see the Son of man coming in
the clouds of heaven... this generation shall not pass, till all these things be
fulfilled. (Matt. 24:27,30,34)
It is obvious that Piso, the writer of the New Testament, borrowed the messianic concepts from the book of
Daniel and erroneously applied them to his Christ/Jesus stories briefly mentioned in his writings.
It is interesting to note that the Qumran Zodokite Document states that "After 390 years of captivity God
restored his people; twenty years later he raised up a Teacher of Righteousness, and that twenty years after
the Teacher of Righteousness the "men of war will be consumed in a great battle." (D.S. Russell, The Method
and Message of Jewish Apocalyptic 1964, p. 201)
According to Piso, at St. John 1:41, the appellation "Messias" is interpreted as "The Christ." "The word
'Messiah' (Hebrew Mahsiah) occurs frequently in the Old Testament. The Jews who made the Septuagint (ca. 280
B.C.E.) translated it to the Greek 'Christos, the anointed,' he upon whom has been poured a chrism of
holy oil." (Will Durant, Caesar and Christ, Footnote p. 544)
It follows then, that the Messiah of Daniel's revelation could also be called Christ. And if the Jesus/Jason
of ca. 159 B.C.E. was the expected Messiah, as shone above, it also follows that Piso's Jason/Jesus could also
legitimately be called "The Christ."
THE GENEALOGY OF JESUS
The Prophet Samuel tells us that:
The word of the Lord came to Nathan saying, go and tell my servant David...
I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels
and I will establish his kingdom... forever. (2nd Samuel 7:4, 5, 12)
Piso, applying these verses to Christ, tells that David "being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with
an oath to him, that out of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on
his throne." (Acts 2:30)
Piso seems to be suspiciously determined to, inform his readers of Jesus' decent from King David of the Old
Testament: (Matt. 9:27, 12:23, 21:9, Mark, 10:48, Luke 2:4, John, 7:42, 2nd Tim. 2:8, and Rev. 22:16.
From David to the Captivity
Piso tells us that there were fourteen generations "from David until the carrying away into Babylon.... And from
the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations." (Matt. 1:17)
Piso's Matthew's list is almost completely different from the seventeen generation list he gives in Luke 3:23.
Piso's Matthew's list of names from David to the captivity follows closely the name list given in the book 1st
Chronicles 3:10, except four of the names; Joash, Amaziah, Azeriah and Jehoiakim were left out of the Matthew
list apparently to make the number come out to the prescribed number fourteen. This omission makes the Matthew
list artificial. Piso's second list of names, from the captivity to Christ, cannot be verified from Old Testament
name lists and also appears to be artificial. Piso's Mark, the earliest written of the gospels, omitted any
reference to the genealogy of Jesus.
[ 22 ]
GENEALOGY FROM DAVID TO THE CAPTIVITY
Matthew 1:6-11
David
Solomon
Roboam
Abia
Asa
Josaphat
Joram
Ozias
Joatham
Achaz
Ezekias
Manasses
Amon
Josias
Jechonias
|
Luke 3:27-31
David
Nathan
Mattatha
Meman
Melea
Eliakim
Jonan
Joseph
Juda
Simeon
Levi
Matthat
Jorim
Eliezer
Jose
Er
Elmodam
Cosam
Addi
Melchi
Neri
|
1 Chron. 3:9-17
David
Solomon
Rehoboam
Abia
Asa
Jehoshaphat
Joram
Ahaziah
* Joash
* Amaziah
* Azariah
Jotham
Ahaz
Hezekiah
Manasseh
Amon
Josiah
* Jehoiakim
Jeconiah
|
Josephus Antq. VIII, I, I, X,VII, I
David
Solomon
Jehoboam
Asa
Elah
Zimri
Omri
Ahab
Ahaziah
Joram
Juha
Johoash
Jehoahaz
Amaziah
Uzziah
Jotham
Ahaz
Hezekiah
Manasseh
Ammon
Josiah
Jehoiakim
Jeconiah
|
GENEALOGY FROM THE CAPTIVITY TO JESUS
Matthew 1:11-17
Salathiel
Zorobabel
Abiud
Elikim
Azor
Sadoc
Achim
Eliud
Eleazar
Matthan
Jacob
Joseph
Jesus
|
Luke 3:23-27
Salathiel
Zorobable
Rhesa
Joanna
Juda
Joseph
Semei
Mattathias
Maath
Nagge
Esli
Naum
Mattathias
Joseph
Janna
Melchi
Levi
Matthat
Heli
Joseph
Jesus
|
Nehemiah 12:1-26
Salathiel
Zerubbable
Jozadak
Jeshua (Jesus)
Joiakim
Eliasib
Joiada
Jonathan
Juddua
|
Josephus Antq. XI, III, XXII, V, I
Salathiel
Zorobabel
Josedek
Jeshua (Jesus)
Joacim
Eliasib
Judas
John
Juddua
Onias
Simon
Eleasar
Manasseh
Jesus/Jason
|
* Names left out of Matthew genealogy.
[ 23 ]
THE KING HEROD STORY
According to Piso, King Herod lived in fear that "one" would arise that would take his kingdom from him":
Herod offered him (Markas Antonius) money to make him king, as he had formerly given it
to him to make him to make him Tetrarch.... But Antigonus, by way of reply to what Herod
had proclaimed... said that they would not do justly if they gave the kingdom to Herod,
who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, ie. a half Jew, whereas they ought
to bestow it on one of the holy family, as their custom was; for, that in case they at
present bear an ill-will to him, and had resolved to deprive him of the kingdom, as having
received it from the Parthians, yet were there many others of his family that might by
their law take it, and these such as had no way offended the Romans; and being of the
sacerdotal family, it would be an unworthy thing to put them by, now... they said thus
one to another, and fell to reproaching one another on both sides...
(Antq. XIV, XIV, 4, XIV, XV, 2)
From Piso's statement, it is plain to see that from the beginning, there were serious reservations on the part
of King Herod's own family as to whether Herod should be made "king of the Jews." Piso goes on to say:
Strabo (the Roman historian) attests to what I have said, when he thus speaks:
'Antony ordered Antigonus the Jew to be brought to Antioch, and there to be beheaded...
as supposing he could in no way bend the minds of the Jews so as to receive Herod,
whom he had made king in his stead; for by no torments could they be forced to call
him king, so great a fondness they had for their former king; so he thought that this
dishonorable death would diminish the value they had for Antigonus' memory, and at the
same time would diminish the hatred they bear for Herod. Thus for Strabo' (Antq. XV, I, 2)
Herod took Jerusalem by force and was made king and governor without having just claim to the government. To
further secure his position, Herod deposed the royal high priest Hycranus, and replaced him with Ananelus
"an obscure priest out of Babylon." This action, on the part of Herod, "occasioned a sedition in his own
family." Alexandra, the daughter of Hycranus, and wife of Alexander, could not bear this indignity,
believing that her own son, Aristobulus, should be made "King of the Jews." "Now this son was one of the
greatest comeliness... and the daughter Mariamne was married to Herod and eminent for her beauty also...
These children seemed not derived from men, but from some god or other."
THE FLIGHT INTO EGYPT
Piso continues:
Alexandra was much disturbed because Herod had secured the priesthood office for himself
when it was Alexandra's son Aristobulus who was the rightful heir. Herod feared that one
day the child god would deprive him of the kingdom. 'Alexandra privately conspired against
Herod's (supposed) royal authority and endeavored to bring it about that he might be
deprived of the government. She therefore sent to Cleopatra, and made a long complaint of
the circumstances she was in, and entreated her to do her utmost for her assistance.
Cleopatra hereupon advised her to take her son with her, and come away immediately to
Egypt. This advice pleased her; and she had this contrivance for getting away: she got
two coffins made, as if they were to carry away two bodies, and put herself into one,
and her son into the other and gave orders to such of her servants as knew of her intentions,
to carry them away in the night-time. (Antq. XV, II, 5, XV, 111, 2)
In Matthew, Piso tells a similar story about the child god Jesus:
When Herod the king heard these things, (the birth of Jesus) he was troubled,
and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests
and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ
should be born.... And... the angel of
[ 24 ]
the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying: Arise, and take the young
child and his mother and flee into Egypt... for Herod will seek the young
child to destroy him. And when he arose, he took the young child and his
mother by night, and departed into Egypt: and was there until the death of
Herod. (Matthew 2:3, 4, 13-15)
KING HEROD SLAYS THE INFANTS
Piso writes:
When Herod was near his death he spake thus to them: 'I shall die in a little
time, so great are my pains... but what troubles me is this, that I shall
die without being lamented, and without such mourning as men usually expect
at a king's death.' So Herod took care, when he was departing out of this
life, that the whole nation should be put into mourning, and indeed made
desolate of their dearest kindred, when he gave orders that one in every
family should be slain.... Now Herod altered his testament and granted the
kingdom to Archelaus. (Antq. XVII, VI, 5,6)
In Matthew, Piso writes:
Then Herod was exceedingly wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children
that were in Bethlehem, and all the coasts thereof, from two years old and
younger... But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth
in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, arise, and take the young child and
his mother and come into the land of Israel. But when he beheld that Archelaus
did reign in Judea in the room of his father Herod he was afraid to go
thither." (Matthew 2:16, 19, 22)
The story by Piso of the slaying of "one in every family", at Herod's command, after his death in the year
4 B.C.E., corresponds in time to his story in Matthew that "Herod slew all the children" at Christ's birth
in ca. 4 B.C.E. and seems to confirm that both stories were telling of the same event.
DEATH OF A GOD
Piso writes that King Herod feared that he might be deprived of the government by the child god Aristobulus,
the legal heir, who was said to be "not derived from men, but some god or other so he:
proposed to himself to put this young man out of the way.... And now upon
the feast of the tabernacles.... Herod drew Aristobulus into a lonely place
and had him killed. When this sad accident was told the women their joy
was soon changed into lamentation at the sight of the dead body that lay
before them, and their sorrow was immoderate.... Herod endeavored that none
abroad should believe that the child's death was caused by any cause of
his.... although his death was supposed to tend to his own security... as
for Aristobulus' funeral, he took care that it should be very magnificent,
by making great preparation for the sepulcher to lay his body in. and
providing a great quantity of spices... till the very women, who were in
such great sorrow, were astonished at it... (Antq. XV, III, 2-4)
Piso's story, of the death of the child god Aristobulus is similar to that which he tells of the death of
Jesus in the New Testament:
After two days was the feast of the Passover, and of unleavened bread: and
the chief priests and the Scribes sought him that they might take Jesus by
craft, and put him to death.... And the chief priests accused him of many
things; but he answered them nothing... and they cried out... crucify
him... and it was the third hour.... And the centurion said; truly was
this man the son of God. There were also women looking afar off... and
many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem....
And Joseph brought up fine linen and laid him in a sepulcher.... And Mary
Magdalene and Mary the mother of James, and Salome had brought sweet spices,
that they might come and anoint him. (Mark, 14:1, 15:3, 37-47, 16:1)
[ 25 ]
The killing of the god in both stories took place at the approach of the "Feast of the Tabernacles" or "passover."
In both stories "spices" were brought to the sepulcher to anoint the dead body of the god. In both stories women
mourn the death of the god. In Piso's "Josephus," the names of the women who mourn are not given, but it is
logical that the dead child-god's relatives, Mariamne and Salome would have been among the women mentioned. In
his "Mark," it was the two Marys and Salome who came to mourn.
There is no question that the account from Piso's Josephus, and his New Testament account, were telling the same
story. The only basic difference is that in Piso's New Testament account the name Jesus was used instead of
Aristobulus.
There are also many similarities between the Piso account and his New Testament account concerning Herod's
dealings with the god, Mary and Joseph, prier to the god's death.
In both stories, Herod is obsessed with the thought that one day the child-god would deprive him of the kingdom.
In both accounts Mary flees to Egypt with the child-god to escape the wrath of King Herod. In both stories Herod
kills or threatens to kill children, both tell of the death of Herod and the passing of the kingdom to Archelaus,
Herod's son, and in both the God, or child god is eventually killed. A sepulcher is provided, soldiers are
mentioned, and women come to the tomb to mourn.
There seems to be no question that Piso is telling of the same event in both accounts. However there are some
notable differences. In his earlier account it is Alexandra, the sister of the child-god who takes him to Egypt.
In his Matthew account it is the child-gods parents, Joseph and Mary who make the journey. In his first account
Mariamne is the wife of Herod while his Matthew account tells that Mary is the wife of Joseph. The threat of
"slaying of one in every family" at the death of Herod, differs from the "slew all the children" in his later
account. And most notable of all, in Piso's Josephus account it was the "child-god Aristobulus" who was the
center of the story, while in his synoptics it was the "Jesus the Christ-child."
CRUCIFIED JEWS
Crucifixion was the Roman method of capital punishment. Piso tells us:
...they were first whipped and then tormented with all sorts of tortures
before they died, and then were crucified before the walls of the city...
so the Soldiers, out of the wrath and hatred they bore the Jews, nailed
those they caught, one after one way, and another after another, to the
crosses, by way of jest; when their multitude was so great, that room was
wanting for the crosses, and crosses -wanting for the bodies.
(Josephus' Wars V, XI, I)
In the New Testament Piso writes:
And so Pilot... delivered Jesus, when he had scourged (whipped) him, to be
crucified. And the soldiers led him away.... And they clothed him with purple,
and planted a crown of thorns, and put it about his head, and began to
salute him. Hail, King of the Jews!.... Thomas said unto them, except I
shall see in his hands the print of the nails... I shall not believe.
(Mark 15:15-18, John 20:24, 25)
THREE DAYS IN THE EARTH
Piso:
... the Romans went away rejoicing, as taking it for granted that Niger was
destroyed; but he leaped out of the tower into a subterraneous cave, and in
the inter most part of it, was preserved, and on the third day afterward he
spake out of the ground to those who with great lamentations were searching
for him, in order to give him a decent funeral; and when he was come out he
filled all the Jews with unexpected Joy, as though he was preserved by God's
providence to be their commander for the time to come. (Wars III, II, 3)
Piso's Gospel of Luke reads:
For he taught his disciples, and said to them, The Son of Man is delivered
into the hands of men, and they shall kill him, and after he is killed, he
shall rise the third day.... and as they
[ 26 ]
spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, peace
be unto you. .... And they worshipped him, and returned with great joy.
(Mark, 9:31, Luke 24:36-39, 53)
In the gospel story, the Romans thought they had killed the Nazerene. In the Piso story the Romans thought they
had killed Niger. In his gospel account Piso's Christ was in the sepulcher three days and his followers thought
he was dead. In both accounts, the supposed dead person, after coming out of the sepelchre or cave, spoke to
those who were mourning his death. In both stories the Jews were filled with unexpected great joy on learning
that he was alive, and in both, the person would be their future leader.
The story elements in Piso's Niger story seem to confirm that the controversial statement given at Antq. 18:3,
of Christ's resurrection after three days in the tomb, was authentic and not a later interpolation by Christian
writers.
WAS MARY UNFAITHFUL TO HER HUSBAND?
Piso tells that it was rumored that Mariamne was "false to Herod's bed," Mariamne's soldier-uncle Joseph being
the seducer. Herod's sister Salome "confirmed the suspicion about Joseph." Herod commanded that both of them
be slain immediately. (Wars, I, XXIII, 3-5)
It is interesting that Celsus, the Roman historian c. 250 C.E. circulated with others a scandalous story about
the New Testament Mary and a Roman soldier. (Guignburt, Jesus p. 127, Kalusner, p. 23, cited in Will
Durant, Caesar and Christ 1944, p.559)
Jesus is occasionally referred to in the Rabinical literature as Jesus Ben Pantera or Ben Pandira... according
to Origin, Panther was a sir-name of Jesus' grandfather Jacob. (This was a reply to a Jewish calumny, quoted
by Celsus, that Pantheras was the name of a pagan soldier.) (F.F. Bruce, Jesus and Christian Origins Outside
the New Testament p. 57) The writings attributed to Matthew contain a shadow of the scandalous story.
Now the birth of Jesus was on this wise: when as his mother was espoused to
Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost,
then her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick
example, was minded to put her away privily. Matt. 1:18, 19)
THE TALMUD MARY STORIES
...the Talmud Mary stories... revolve entirely around the accusation of her
unfaithfulness to her husband.... Simon ben Azzai has said: 'I found in
Jerusalem a book of genealogies; wherein was written: that so and so is
the bastard son of a married woman' This Simon ben Azzai flourished.., at
the end of the first and beginning of the second century. (Note that Piso
published in 94 CE) .... this book of genealogies can be taken to mean
nothing else than an official record; nevertheless we are told that it
contained proof of Jeschu's bastardy, for "so and so" is one of the well
known substitutes for Jesus and Jesus alone in the Talmud, as has been
proved and admitted on either side.... "the virgin birth" doctrine was
invented in answer to this record.... we therefore conclude that the earliest
Jewish Mary legends came to birth somewhere towards the close of the
first century. It is exceedingly difficult to classify these Mamzer legends
or to treat them in any satisfactory chronological fashion, but it is
remarkable that in them there seems to be two deposits of tradition
characterized by different names for Jeschu -- ben Strada and ben Pandera,
names... of which the current meaning was evidently simply "son of a harlot"....
Finally in these Talmud-Mary legends we come to the thrice-repeated Miriam,
daughter of Bilga story which runs as follows: 'Bilga always receives his
part on the south side, on account of Miriam, daughter of Bilga, who turned
apostate and went to marry a soldier.... Laible, refers to Origin, quoting
Celsus as making his Jew declare that 'Mary gave birth to Jesus by a
certain soldier, Panthera.' (G.R.S. Mead, Did Jesus live 100 B.C. pp. 162-166)
In the Piso story, it was Mariamne's soldier-uncle Joseph with whom Mariamne was "false to Herod's bed."
[ 27 ]
WAS MARY THE MARIAM OF THE TALMUD?
According to Piso, Elisabeth, Mary's cousin, "was of the daughters of Aaron. (Luke 1:5) Miriam of the Talmud
stories was said to have been of the daughters of Bilga, who was of the "house of Aaron" (1st Chron. 24:14)
Miriam, then, was of the same Aaronic lineage as Elisabeth. Since Mary and Elisabeth were cousins, it follows
that both Mary and Miriam were descendants of Aaron. This seems to confirm that the Mary of the New Testament
and the Mary of the Talmud were the same person.
THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS
The Gospel of Thomas was part of the Nag Hammadi discoveries in Egypt in 1945. The author of these writings
apparently knew of the scandalous Herod-Miriamne-Joseph story cited by Piso. This writer has Jesus say:
"...whoever recognizes father and mother will be called the child of a whore." (Marvin W. Meyer, The Secret
Sayings of Jesus, 1984, p. 37)
This saying, attributed to Jesus, may explain the difficult verse in Luke: "Whoever does not hate father and
mother as I do cannot be my disciple" (Luke 14:26)
FALSE WRITINGS
The pseudepigrapha has traditionally included pseudonymous and anonymous Jewish
writings produced between 200 B.C.E. and 200 C.E. They usually purport to have
been written by illustrious figures from Jewish history who lived long before
they were actually composed. (Tanner, Rogers and McMurrin, Towards Understanding
the New Testament, 1990, footnote p. 59)
This period gave rise to a quite unique literature, in which were manufactured
facts for the past and for the future, and did not submit to the usual literary
rules and forms, but came forward with the loftiest pretensions. Particular sayings
and arguments of assumed "apostolic teachers" were brought forward as being of
great authority. (G.R.S. Mead Fragments of a Faith Forgotten, 1960, p. 125)
A NEW RELIGION
If it is indeed possible to develop a likely scenario, as to how, and why, the New Testament was written, it may
proceed something like this; With the Destruction of Jerusalem in 70 C.E., the Jews were dispersed into Arabia,
Syria, Egypt, Babylon, and Italy. By the time Piso published in 93-94 C.E., the simple, true story of the
Nazerine became more and more obscure until it had almost completely disappeared from folklore. A new
"pseudonymous history" could be safely developed by the Piso family, The Jews, who in past centuries, had been
the source of irreconcilable conflict to the Greeks and now to the Romans, flocked to Rome in increasing numbers.
No doubt Roman officials could see that if the Jewish influx into Rome continued, the same age-old conflict
would raise her ugly head. Solution; Find a way to appease the pious Jews by creating a new religion based
primarily on the Messianic hope of the Jews, but retaining Roman mythology. Piso's new pseudonymous history
called the "New Testament" was apparently written sometime after 80 C.E.
Since certain events in the life of the New Testament apostle Paul seem to have been taken from the writings
of Piso, and since Paul was not part of the synoptic gospels, it seems probable that Paul's history was an
afterthought; Propaganda created by the Roman writer to create the impression that the church had been in
existence for some 70 years.
[ 28 ]
HILLEL THE BABYLONIAN
"Hillel the younger c. 30 B.C.E., stands as a classic figure of a Palestine
scholar... as little is known with certainty about his life as about his near
contemporary, Jesus, whose saintly silhouette suggests similar qualities of
sensitivity and wisdom.... According the accepted tradition, he was born
abysmally poor, of non-priestly family in Babylon. He became the leading
scholar of his century in Jerusalem.... In the tradition of many exciting
teachers Hillel founded a school founded for him, Bet-Hillel, and uniquely
a dynasty which gained for itself a teacher as well as a scribe, a mystic,
a man of retreats and silence, and a sensitive man who knew well the anguish
of the poor....
Analysis of Hillel's few surviving decisions reveal a concern for the common
folk, women and thee outcast. To be sure, the search for the historical Hillel
is almost as difficult as the much more famous search for the contemporary,
Jesus...
Hillel set character above ceremonial punctilio... 'Be of the disciples of
Aaron, loving peace.' He lived by a code of infinite patience, and was deeply
concerned for another's feelings: 'Do not appear standing among those who
sit, or seated among those who stand.' He set human relations over possessions
and learning above all attainments: 'The more flesh, the more worms: the more
possessions, the more worry: and 'The more Torah, the more life; the more
study and contemplation, the more wisdom; the more counsel, the more discernment;
The more charity, the more peace.'
Hillel's theology is submissive. 'Blessed
be the Lord, day by day. he bears our burden.' 'My humiliation is my exaltation,
my exaltation is my humiliation... the uneducated man knows not the fear of sin'
'He who has knowledge of the Torah has life in the world to come,' Torah was
the way of 'gaining life in this world and life in the world to come.' In
learning the Torah one... becomes truly free.... By properly obeying the Torah...
he becomes united with Him.... He who 6bserves the Torah merited salvation.'
(J.D. Silver, A history of Judaism Vol. 1, pp. 234-237).
To a pagan who said he would become a Jew if he could be taught the Torah while
standing on one foot, Hillel is said to have replied, "what is hateful to you
do not unto your neighbor; this is the entire Torah. All the rest is commentary
-- go and study it....." (Paul Jonston, A History of the Jews pp. 127.)
CONCLUSION
The New Testament Jesus appears to have been a composite figure. A combination of several Jesus personalities
invented by Calpernius Piso. There was the Josiah-Jesus who at twelve years of age offered the accustomed
sacrifices at the Jerusalem temple. There was Jesus the High Priest of the Jerusalem temple, who attempted to
helenize the Jews but failed. There was the "Jesus of Galilee," who was crucified by the Idumeans, and finally
there was the c. 65 A.D. Jesus who pronounced woe upon the people of Jerusalem.
G.A. Wells agrees with my theory that there was more than one Jesus displayed in the New Testament:
In the twenty seven books of the New Testament there is not one Jesus but many,
and from the beginning, Christians were divided about his fundamental nature.
(Wells The Historical Evidence For Jesus, p. 197)
"Christianity did not destroy paganism, it adopted it .... The Greek mysteries
passed down into the impressive mystery of the mass. Other pagan cultures
contributed to the syncretist result. From Egypt came the idea of a divine
trinity, the last judgment, and a personal immortality of reward and punishment;
from Egypt the adoration of the mother and child.... From Syria the resurrection
drama of Adonis; from thence, perhaps the cult of Dionysus, the dying and saving
God. From Persia came millenarianism, the age of the world, the final conflagration,
the dualism of Satan and God.... Christianity was the last great creation of the
pagan world" (Will Durant Caesar and Christ p. 595)
|